MedTrace Logo

Circuitry Assessment and Reinforcement Training Effects on Recovery

NCT04290988 · Status: TERMINATED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 7

Last updated 2026-02-05

Study results available
· View outcomes & findings →

Summary

This study investigates if electroencephalography (EEG) neurofeedback training is more beneficial than sham feedback training for the improvement of communication, anxiety, and sleep quality in individuals with aphasia. Half of the participants will receive active EEG neurofeedback sessions first, followed by sham feedback sessions in a crossover design. The other half of participants will undergo sham feedback sessions first, followed by active neurofeedback.

Conditions

  • Aphasia
  • Primary Progressive Aphasia
  • Stroke

Interventions

DEVICE

EEG Neurofeedback

Active EEG neurofeedback

DEVICE

Sham Feedback

Sham EEG feedback sessions identical to active sessions except that the feedback given to the participant will not be based on the individual's live EEG activity.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Principal Investigators

  • Argye E Hillis, MD, MA · Johns Hopkins School of Medicine

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Model
CROSSOVER

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2020-09-23
Primary Completion
2025-09-01
Completion
2025-09-01
FDA Device
Yes

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Diseases
Companies

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04290988 on ClinicalTrials.gov