Functional Evaluation of Ceramic Onlay Restorations With Different Preparation Designs
NCT04274959 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 39
Last updated 2020-02-18
Summary
Tooth preparation designs for posterior ceramic restorations have been based on traditional cast metal restoration designs, but with more occlusal tooth reduction and with a slightly increased taper. These preparations may involve the removal of considerable tooth structure. As more structure is removed, higher tooth strain and lower fracture resistance may occur.5 The increased tooth structure loss may increase cuspal flexure, thereby reducing the tooth fracture resistance, or open the restoration-tooth interface .
However, it has been demonstrated that cusp recovery results in fewer failures, likely increasing the longevity of posterior ceramic restorations. Recently, minimally invasive cavity preparations for posterior indirect restorations were demonstrated to present the benefit of conservation of tooth structure, as well as improved stress distribution. However, the performance of posterior restoration is also material dependent. Due to the continuous advancements in dental ceramics and innovative manufacturing techniques.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical functional performance of ceramic onlay restorations with butt joint preparation design and compare them to shoulder preparation design.
Conditions
- Posterior Ceramic Onlays
- Badly Decayed Teeth Need to be Restored , Teeth Restored With Large Filling Restorations
Interventions
- OTHER
-
ceramic onlay with shoulder preparation design.
ceramic onlay with shoulder preparation design which allowing the largest possible enamel for adhesion ,
- OTHER
-
,ceramic onlay with butt joint preparation design
ceramic onlay with butt joint preparation design with cusp reduction to protect teeth from occlusal loads and cuspal fracture
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Cairo University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
nora alsedawy, M.D.s · Cairo University
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 25 Years
- Max Age
- 45 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2020-02-20
- Primary Completion
- 2021-02-01
- Completion
- 2021-06-01
More Related Trials
-
One Year Clinical Evaluation of Conservative Versus Conventional Ceramic Onlays
NCT05250232 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Restoration of Endodontically Treated Teeth Using Indirect Full Coverage Restorations Compared to Direct Composite Resin Restorations
NCT04249726 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Influence of Operator Factors on Succes and Survival of Indirect Restorations
NCT05265559 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Comparing Between Two Different Restoration
NCT05556551 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Endocrowns in Anterior Teeth: Effect of Cementation Protocols and Restorative Materials on the Clinical Performance of the Restorations
NCT05973292 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Clinical Evaluation of Posterior Indirect Adhesive Restorations
NCT04293770 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Restoration of Non-carious Cervical Lesions With Different Resin Composites and Universal Adhesive
NCT06393699 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Two Different Resin-Matrix Ceramic Restorations
NCT07265609 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Direct Composite Veneer Restorations
NCT05842590 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Assessment of Indirect Restoration Fabricated From Nano Hybrid Composite Blocks Versus Ceramic Blocks in Badly Broken Teeth One Year Follow up
NCT04563624 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Clinical Outcomes of Premolars Restored With Ceramic Vonlay Restorations Versus Onlay Using Modified USPHS Criteria
NCT05114122 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Adhering Flowable Composite With and Without Adhesive Vs Flowable in Cervical Lesions
NCT03859284 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance Of Lithium Disilicate Crowns Restoring Endodontically Treated Teeth With Two Occlusal Preparation Schemes
NCT04054674 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Full Veneered Porcelain-Fused-to-Metal Crowns Cemented With Self-Adhesive Resin Cement Using Two Curing Modes
NCT07043998 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Attitude And Practice of Egyptian Dental Practitioners Regarding Restoration Repair
NCT06417879 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Clinical Performance of Short Fiber Reinforced Flowable Resin Composite Restorations 2y RCT
NCT04720638 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Laminate Veneers With Coronal Post Versus Post and Core Foundation Restoration With Single Crown for Restoration of Endodontically Treated Anterior Teeth (Randomized Controlled Trial) "In-vivo Study"
NCT03314545 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Different Resin Cements
NCT04694690 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Composite Coronal Build -Up in Mutilated Primary Incisors: 3 Years Results
NCT04758221 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Fracture Resistance and Color Changes of Laminate Veneer With Gull Wing Preparation
NCT03321474 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Survival of Root Canal Treated Teeth Restored With Ceramic Onlays
NCT03378778 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Restoration Quality in Molars Affected by Molar Incisor Hypo Mineralization
NCT04475419 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Dental Coronal Restorations
NCT03854526 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Evaluation Of Clinical Performance of Self-adhering Flowable Composite vs Conventional Flowable Composite in Cervical Carious Lesions
NCT04475172 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
5-year Clinical Evaluation of Cavity Lining on the Restoration
NCT03802539 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA