A Clinical Study of the USASK Airway - An Improved Oral Airway for Bag-Mask Ventilation
NCT04238507 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 65
Last updated 2020-01-23
Summary
A clinical study of USASK AIRWAY - An Improved Oral Airway for Bag-mask Ventilation
A clinical study of MA AIRWAY - An Improved Oral Airway for Bag-mask Ventilation We report a study with University Research Ethics Board approval of a new oral airway device, the McKay Airway (MA), designed for easy maintenance of jaw-thrust (see illustration) for first responders who may perform bag-mask venti-lation (BMV) infrequently, and who often do not perform it well. Null hypothesis: naïve learners' time to achieve exhaled tidal volume (VE) \>300ml will be no dif-ferent using MA than using a Guedel oropharyngeal airway (OPA) on anesthetized patients. Design was a repeated-measures unblinded controlled trial with blinded randomization of the order of airway use, comparing MA versus OPA conducted from July until December 2019. Anesthesiologists' decision to intervene and comments were recorded. Consenting learners included medical students, resi-dents from specialties other than anesthesiology, operating room staff, or naïve learners in technical courses scheduled in the operating rooms to be taught airway management. Patients were consenting adults booked for elective surgery under general anesthesia (GA). Excepted patients were those with loose incisors, tem-poromandibular joint disorders, reflux, those who did not wish to participate, and those whom the attending anesthesiologist felt put them at any added risk by par-ticipating. For patients with missing teeth, we padded the MA surface with 1cm thick stick-on sponge (Reston™ Self-Adhering Foam Pads; 3M, Maplewood MN USA). Patients were under the direct care of the consenting staff anesthesiologist for that OR. They were recruited in Pre-Admission Clinic, the hospital wards, Same-Day and Day-Surgery units, and in the OR holding area.
The experimental procedure included normal preoxygenation, induction of anesthesia, and BMV by the attending anesthesiologist as needed to assure high oxygen saturation prior to opening an opaque numbered envelope to randomly choose which airway to use first. We mimicked a self-inflating BMV device with the anesthetic machine by setting the Adjustable Pressure Limiting (APL) valve to \>30cm water pressure and using the oxygen flush to ensure that the reservoir bag was filled between breath attempts. With the randomized airway in place, learners applied the mask with their left hand, squeezing the bag with their right approxi-mately every 3s. We timed from the first bag squeeze until VE exceeded 300ml, then repeated the experiment with the other airway. We approached 56 patients, recruited 34 female and 20 male, and obtained data for 51. One obese patient had severe succinylcholine fasciculations with rapid profound desaturation and the an-esthesiologist took over immediately, and for two the anesthesiologist misunder-stood the experiment. Time measurements were analysed with Wilcoxon's Signed Rank test, incidences with Fisher's Exact test or Chi Square. MA allowed faster adequate ventilation than OPA: Hodges-Lehmann median difference: 6s \[95% CI 5 to 6.3s\]; quartiles: OPA 9.5 to 37s; MA 7 to 16s range: OPA 5 to 78s; MA 2 to 49s; p = 0.02. When used first, the MA was faster than the OPA 30% of times compared to 11% when OPA was used first (p = 0.04), suggesting that MA may be easier to learn. Comments: 16 preferred the MA, 2 the OPA, and 15 had no preference (p = 0.02 compared to equal preferences). Further studies are warrant-ed.
Conditions
- Anesthesia, General
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Guedel airway
Following induction of GA, air:O2 flows will be set at 0:10L, the Adjustable Pressure Limiting (APL) valve set to 50cm water pressure, and the reservoir bag filled. The learner will perform BMV with a Guedel airway placed by the anesthesiologist, while the anesthesiologist ensures that the reservoir bag is filled between breath attempts by using the oxygen flush.
- DEVICE
-
USASK airway
Following induction of GA, air:O2 flows will be set at 0:10L, the Adjustable Pressure Limiting (APL) valve set to 50cm water pressure, and the reservoir bag filled. The learner will perform BMV with a USASK airway placed by the anesthesiologist, while the anesthesiologist ensures that the reservoir bag is filled between breath attempts by using the oxygen flush.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
University of Saskatchewan
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Jonathan Gamble · University of Saskatchewan Dept. of Anesthesia Research Director
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- DEVICE_FEASIBILITY
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- SINGLE_GROUP
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 19 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2019-07-22
- Primary Completion
- 2020-07-31
- Completion
- 2020-09-30
Countries
- Canada
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparison of Ambu Auragain and I-Gel Supraglottic Airways in Adult Patients at an Ambulatory Surgery Center
NCT04286581 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Modified William's Airway and U Shaped Guedl's Airway
NCT02850757 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A New Flexible Extended-Length Pharyngeal Airway for Deep Sedation
NCT04419883 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of Laryngeal Mask and I-gel to Laryngoscope by Novice Operators in Simulated Difficult Airway
NCT02224027 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme Versus Laryngeal Tube
NCT02252120 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Prevalence of Major Vessels Underlying the Potential Incision Site for Emergency Front of Neck Airway Access in Adult Surgical Patients With Impalpable Neck Anatomy
NCT06637319 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Pragmatic Airway Resuscitation Trial
NCT02419573 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Laryngeal Mask Airway and Endotracheal Intubation on Mechanical Power in Pediatric Patients
NCT07252674 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Comparison of ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway, LTS-D and I-gel in Mechanically Ventilated Patients
NCT02877940 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Simulated Comparison of Standard Versus Rotational Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion in Novice Anaesthesiologists.
NCT05544838 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Endotracheal Intubation Over the Aintree With Fiberoptic Bronchoskop Via the I-gel and LMA Protector
NCT03501602 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
NuMask Versus Traditional Mask Ventilation During Routine Care
NCT02828280 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
A Study Comparing the Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme With the Laryngeal Mask Airway Protector In the Ambulatory Surgery Unit
NCT03462550 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparative Study of the Baska Mask Vs Proseal Laryngeal Mask Regarding Airway Sealing Pressure
NCT03812081 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Safety and Efficacy of Laryngeal Mask Airways in Sinonasal Surgery
NCT02311153 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A RCT on Supraglottic Airway Versus Endotracheal Intubation in OHCA
NCT02967952 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Fibre-optic Guided Tracheal Intubation Through SADs
NCT03118596 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Safety and Efficacy of the LMA Supreme When Inserted With Patients in the Prone Position
NCT03633942 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
LMA I-Gel Versus LMA Protector During Minor Urological Procedures Under General Anesthesia in Adult Patients
NCT06825910 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Observational Study of Baska Mask, a New Supraglottic Airway Device
NCT01496859 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Respiration and The Airway With Supraglottic Airway Devices
NCT03384056 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Insertion of Different Supraglottic Airway Devices on Manikin
NCT05523752 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Agreement Between Video and In-person Airway Assessment Performed by Anaesthetists in Patients Scheduled for Elective Same-day Gynaecological Procedures
NCT04783584 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Determination of the Optimal Approach to Select the Best Size of BASKA Mask to Use in Male Patients
NCT01625052 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
A Comparison of Fiberoptic Endotracheal Intubation Between the Intubating Laryngeal Tube Suction and the LMA Protector
NCT04618926 ·Status: UNKNOWN