Comparison of the Automatized and the Optimized Carbon Monoxid Rebreathing Protocol

NCT04189250 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 31

Last updated 2020-03-11

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The aim of this study is the comparison of two measurement protocols determining hemoglobin mass with two different blood sampling strategies.Both protocols are based on the principle of the carbonmonoxid (CO) rebreathing method. During this measurement, CO is inhaled for a specific time period by the subject in a closed circuit and it is used as a marker to tag circulating hemoglobin.

Conditions

  • Hemoglobins

Interventions

DEVICE

Automatized carbonmonoxide rebreathing machine - OpCO Detalo instruments

The automatized protocol (aCO) will be conducted with automated system OpCO of Detalo instruments. The intended use of the OpCO Detalo instrument is to quantify hemoglobin mass in human. The principle behind the machine is the widely used CO rebreathing technique. The machine applies automatically the desired CO dose to the patient to determine hemoglobin mass. The Detalo Instruments OpCO is certified conform to the following CE norms: Electromagentic compabilitiy: DIN EN 60601-1-2 and electrical Safety test: LVD 2014/35/EU.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Swiss Federal Institute of Sport Magglingen

    lead OTHER_GOV

Principal Investigators

  • Jon Wehrlin, Dr. scient., MSc. · Swiss Federal Institute of Sport Magglingen

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Model
CROSSOVER

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2020-01-20
Primary Completion
2020-04-20
Completion
2020-08-01

Countries

  • Switzerland

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04189250 on ClinicalTrials.gov