Bangladesh MSNP: Agricultural/Livelihood Mixed Methods Study

NCT04185597 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 4067

Last updated 2021-02-04

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Despite progress in reducing high levels of undernutrition in Bangladesh, gaps in progress persist. They are particularly acute between rural and urban areas, and between the lowest wealth quintile and highest. According to the 2016 Bangladesh DHS report, 38% of rural children under five were stunted compared to 31% of urban children. Forty-nine percent of children in the lowest wealth quintile were stunted compared to 19% in the highest.

To address these discrepancies and lower the overall level of stunting, research is being conducted to assist the government of Bangladesh (GoB) in determining the most effective ways to reduce levels of stunting. In particular, positive correlations between household production and consumption of nutritious food have been widely documented by development organizations in Bangladesh. However, information on how to optimize the delivery of household food production programs is needed.

The primary objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness of current standard practice with two multisectoral intervention packages focused on homestead food production:

1. Homestead food production (HFP) supported by community farmers, Social and Behavior Change Communication (SBCC), strengthened health services, and referrals to health and other services
2. HFP supported by retailers, SBCC, strengthened health services, and referrals to health and other services

The study's primary outcome is the percentage of children 6-23 months old receiving a minimum acceptable diet (MAD), as a proximate determinant for stunting. MAD is defined as the proportion of children 6-23 months old who receive both the minimum feeding frequency and minimum dietary diversity for their age group and breastfeeding status. It will be assessed based on the mother/caregiver report. Secondary outcomes include assessing the knowledge, attitudes, and practices around breastfeeding, complementary feeding, water sanitation and hygiene, health services and gender norms. Quantitative surveys, in depth interviews, focus group discussions, report reviews and process documentation will be used to assess intervention strengths, weakness, and cost effectiveness.

Conditions

  • Stunting
  • Undernutrition

Interventions

OTHER

HFP Intervention: Delivered by Community Farmers

Homestead food production (HFP) supported by community farmers, Social and Behavior Change Communication (SBCC), strengthened health services, and referrals to health and other services

OTHER

HFP Intervention: Delivered by agricultural Retailers

HFP supported by retailers, SBCC, strengthened health services, and referrals to health and other services

OTHER

Control

Current Standard of Practice

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • United States Agency for International Development (USAID)

    collaborator FED
  • FHI 360

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Theresa Hoke, PhD · FHI 360

  • Taufique Jorder, DrPH · FHI 360

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE
Model
SINGLE_GROUP

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2018-07-07
Primary Completion
2020-06-28
Completion
2020-06-28

Countries

  • Bangladesh

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04185597 on ClinicalTrials.gov