MedTrace Logo

Clinical Efficacy of Ceramic vs Resin Block Endocrown

NCT04033380 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 200

Last updated 2019-07-26

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Compare the comfort and durability of Ceramic (VITA,Suprinity ,VS) vs Resin Bloc (VOCO, Grandio Bloc,GB) Endocrown by chairside CAD/CAM system (computer aided design / manufacture).

Objective:To provide information of material selection for the chair-side restoration of the teeth after root canal treatment.

Conditions

  • Tooth Diseases

Interventions

DEVICE

Resin blocs (Grandio Blocs, VOCO)

composite-base bloc (Grandio Blocs, VOCO)

DEVICE

Ceramic (Suprinity, VITA)

glass ceramic zirconia enhanced lithium silicate glass ceramics (Suprinity, VITA)

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Wenjuan Yan, PHD · Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
75 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2019-05-02
Primary Completion
2021-05-30
Completion
2021-10-31

Countries

  • China

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04033380 on ClinicalTrials.gov