Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Two Biphasic Defibrillators in Cardioversion of Atrial Fibrillation

NCT04032678 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 75

Last updated 2020-08-25

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Background: Biphasic truncated exponential (BTE) waveforms are standard for cardiac defibrillation and synchronized cardioversion up to date. BTE waveforms differ by design characteristics and technologies for pulse commutation (rectilinear, standard truncated exponential, pulsed). Clinical evaluation of BTE waveforms can be planned during cardioversion (CVS) as a well-established procedure of atrial fibrillation patients who are able to give consent and also present a more controlled population.

Scarce studies have been found to present the relative efficacy and safety of different BTE waveforms during CVS. The validity of significantly deviating results of the pulsed waveform in one CVS study is questionable.

Objective: To compare the CVS efficacy and safety two different biphasic defibrillators - a standard truncated exponential waveform and a pulsed biphasic waveform.

Experimental design: Patients will be recruited at the Intensive Cardiology Care Unit (ICCU), Cardiology Clinic, University National Heart Hospital (NHH), Sofia, Bulgaria, underwent the pre-CVS medical exams and check for eligibility. All eligible patients will sign a written informed consent prior to the CVS and will receive the standard hospital procedures during CVS, accepted in the NHH, and approved by the NHH Local Ethic Committee.

Atrial fibrillation patients will be alternatively randomized to CVS using one of the two defibrillators, following the same energy selection protocol in both defibrillators. The statistical power analysis will consider a non-inferiority comparison between the cumulative energy actually delivered by both defibrillators.

The secondary CVS outcome measures are: the cumulative success rate (measured at 1 minute post-shock) and number of delivered shocks. Delivered energy will be measured during each shock with a dedicated pulse recording device (approved by the NHH Local Ethic Committee). Heart rhythm will be monitoring in continuously recorded peripheral ECG.

The secondary CVS safety outcome measures: Biochemical markers for myocardial necrosis (high sensitive troponin I - hsTnI, creatine kinase MB fraction - CK-MB) will be evaluated on blood samples taken before and 12 hours after cardioversion; ST-segment changes will be measured in lead II (baseline and 10 s post-shock) and 12-lead ECG; Complications after cardioversion will be measured during 2 hours follow-up period in the ICCU.

Conditions

Interventions

DEVICE

Schiller Defigard Touch 7 - DGT7, Schiller Medical, France

Cardioversion with a pulsed biphasic waveform

DEVICE

LIFEPAK 15, Physio-Control Inc., Redmond, WA, USA

Cardioversion with a biphasic truncated exponential waveform

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University National Heart Hospital

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Elina G Trendafilova, MD · Head of ICCU, NHH

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2019-02-05
Primary Completion
2020-03-30
Completion
2020-08-06

Countries

  • Bulgaria

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04032678 on ClinicalTrials.gov