MedTrace Logo

International Multicenter Project Comparing Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Implantable Defibrillator After Well-tolerated Ventricular Tachycardia in Ischemic Heart Disease with Minimally Impaired Ejection Fraction

NCT06294028 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 268

Last updated 2024-10-24

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Evidence for the usefulness of the defibrillator in cases of preserved left ventricular ejection fraction and well-tolerated ventricular tachycardia (without cardiocirculatory arrest or syncope) is lacking, as no previous trials have included such patients. Additionally, sudden death in this particular population is low compared to other subgroups of patients with malignant ventricular arrhythmias.

On the other hand, numerous recent retrospective data show that ablation of ventricular tachycardia can reduce mortality, and also clearly reduces the number of recurrences in prospective studies.

Finally, a very low rate of sudden death was observed in a multicenter European retrospective study that we conducted, including patients with well-tolerated ventricular tachycardia in structural heart disease with minimally impaired ejection fraction and benefiting from ablation without implantation of defibrillator.

Conditions

  • Ischemic Heart Disease
  • Ventricular Tachycardia

Interventions

OTHER

Adverse events collection

Collection of deaths from any cause, hospitalizations or emergency consultations for any event related to ventricular arrhythmia or its treatment (recurrence of ventricular tachycardia or complication linked to the defibrillator or crossover from one group to another)

OTHER

Quality of life questionnaire EQ-5D-5L

Questionnaire on the patient's quality of life and health in 6 questions: on mobility, the person's autonomy, current activities, pain, anxiety. Answers range from "no problem" to "unable" and 5 possible answers to each question. The last question concerns the patient's health, the patient must rate his or her health on a scale of 0 to 100

OTHER

Medical-economic evaluation

Collection of expenses incurred by the care of patients in each arm will be collected over a period of 36 months. Direct medical and non-medical costs as well as costs related to absences from the workplace will be included in the analysis. Healthcare consumption will be collected using the National Health Data System (SNDS).

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University Hospital, Toulouse

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Philippe MAURY, MD · University Hospital, Toulouse

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
90 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2024-06-12
Primary Completion
2029-12-31
Completion
2029-12-31

Countries

  • France

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06294028 on ClinicalTrials.gov