MedTrace Logo

Transseptal vs Retrograde Aortic Ventricular Entry to Reduce Systemic Emboli

NCT03946072 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 153

Last updated 2023-12-26

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized (1:1) controlled comparative effectiveness trial of a transseptal approach to left ventricular ablation compared to a retrograde aortic approach to prevent cerebral emboli and neurocognitive decline in adults with ventricular tachycardia (VT) and/or premature ventricular contractions (PVCs).

Conditions

  • Neurocognitive Dysfunction

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Transseptal Aortic Approach Catheter Ablation Procedure

The transseptal approach entails obtaining femoral venous access, and, guided by fluoroscopy and intra-cardiac ultrasound, starting with a transseptal needle or radio frequency (RF) device inside the dilator of a long sheath; pulling down until the fossa ovalis in the interatrial septum is engaged on both fluoroscopy and intracardiac echo imaging; once on the left side, the long sheath is advanced over the transseptal needle, the needle and dilator are removed, and the ablation catheter can then be advanced across the mitral valve into the left ventricle.

PROCEDURE

Retrograde Aortic Approach Catheter Ablation Procedure

The retrograde aortic approach entails obtaining femoral arterial access and leaving a sheath in the femoral artery. Under fluoroscopy, an ablation catheter is then advanced up the ascending aorta where the catheter tip is curved using an internal mechanism controlled on the handle of the catheter to form a large loop (to prevent the tip from traveling down a coronary artery and causing trauma such as a dissection); the curved loop is advanced around the aortic arch and down the ascending aorta. To cross the aortic valve with this loop, the catheter is typically torqued in various directions until it falls through the aortic valve and into the left ventricle.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Principal Investigators

  • Gregory Marcus, MD · University of California, San Francisco

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2019-07-02
Primary Completion
2023-11-25
Completion
2023-11-25

Countries

  • United States
  • Canada

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Companies

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03946072 on ClinicalTrials.gov