Indication of Permanent Cardiac Parcing After Tanscatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

NCT02337140 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 165

Last updated 2016-12-01

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Since 2002, transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has resulted in a dramatic change in the prognosis of patients with aortic valve stenosis illegible to surgery. However, this intervention may induce heavy conduction disorder due to the proximity of the aortic annulus and the conduction pathways. So far, there is no clear recommandation for clinical management of conduction disorder after TAVI. Standard criterion cannot be applied due to the multiple comorbidity factors observed in these patients. As described in conventional aortic valve surgery, a degree of inflammation and ischemia of the conduction pathways may be involved in the first days. This is the reason underlying the systematic implantation of epicardial electrodes. Such temporary back-up pacing is not possible in TAVI patients.

The primary end-point of this study is to confirm that standard criterion for pacing are reliable in post-TAVI conduction disorders and to analyze the contribution of a systematic electrophysiological study (EPS).

In TAVI patients, indications for pacing were persistent high-degree atrioventricular block (AVB) or bundle branch block appearance associated to HV interval longer than 70ms, 24 hours after the procedure.

After a two-month follow-up, clinical and ECG evaluation and 24-hour holter monitoring will be realized in patients without pacemaker and compared to data obtained from the devices in pacemaker-implanted patients (% of ventricular pacing \> 1% ; presence of more than 1 AVB episod).

Conditions

  • Aortic Valve Stenosis

Interventions

DEVICE

Pacemaker SORIN Group KORA DR

PROCEDURE

transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University Hospital, Montpellier

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • THOMANN SARAH, MD · University Hospital, Montpellier France

Study Design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
50 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2014-08-31
Primary Completion
2016-04-30
Completion
2016-08-31

Countries

  • France

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02337140 on ClinicalTrials.gov