Laparoscopic TEP (Total Extra-peritoneal) Repair Vs Open PHS (Prolene Hernia System)
NCT03842852 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 577
Last updated 2019-02-19
Summary
Abdominal wall hernias are common, with a lifetime risk of 27% in men and 3% in women.
Inguinal and femoral hernias are the most common affections faced by primary care physicians that require surgical intervention.
The most common hernia in both sexes is the indirect inguinal hernia. The male-to-female ratio is 9:1 for inguinal hernias and 1:3 for femoral hernias. Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most common operations undertaken in routine surgical practice.
Since the introduction of the Bassini method in 1887, more than 70 types of pure tissue repair have been reported in the surgical literature. Throughout the years, attention was paid to the recurrences that occur after the use of tissue approximation technique, in the literature it has been reported that they occur in up to 34% of cases, being that the actual incidence of recurrences it is underreported, therefore, the repair of the hernia with approximation of tissue has practically been abandoned.
The concept of tension free repair for hernias was introduced by Lichtenstein who explain that the prime etiologic factor behind most herniorrhaphy failures is the suturing together, under tension, of structures that are not normally in apposition. The technique of the hernioplasty with the use of mesh was not widely accepted at first, the expansion of the use of mesh expanded for years. The use of mesh increased from 7 per cent of all operations in 1992 to 51 per cent in 1996. Currently, groin hernia treatment is not standardized but, today, tension free mesh repair technique is regarded as gold standard. Based in the Stoppa technique, the laparoscopic hernia repair was developed in 1991. The most common laparoscopic techniques for inguinal hernia repair are transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair and total extraperitoneal (TEP) repair. The use of the laparoscopic technique was progressively increasing based on the advantages of minimal invasive procedures, but since the publication of Neumayer in 2004, where he reports a recurrent incidence in laparoscopic hernia of 10.1 % compared with 4% for open surgery, the use of laparoscopic repair declines considerably. Surgeons remain divided on the best technique for inguinal hernia repair: while more than half never perform laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair, today the laparoscopic technique for hernia repair is used in 28% of cases, of which 25% is used the TEP approach and is considered the best approach for bilateral inguinal hernia repair (17). Advantages and disadvantages of TEP are: faster return to usual activities, operation times are longer and there appears to be a higher risk of serious complication rate in respect of visceral (especially bladder) and vascular injuries (18).
In 1999, Gilbert published the use of bilayer patch device, known as prolene ® hernia system (Ethicon; Somerville, NJ, USA) (PHS) to repair inguinal hernia. The unique feature of this polypropylene mesh device is that it has attached the component, its underlay patch provides a pre-peritoneal repair, a connector that has the desirable attributes of a plug and an onlay patch covers the back wall. In the literature, better results have been reported for PHS repair than for Lichtenstein repair. The advantages of the anterior repair of inguinal hernias are: low operative costs, short learning curve, reproducible results at all levels and the possibility of the use of local anesthesia.
The objective of this study is to compare the results of laparoscopic totally extra-peritoneal repair (LTEPR) with open prolene hernia system repair (OPHSR) retrospectively.
Conditions
- Inguinal Hernia
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Inguinal hernia repair
The grupo one underwent open repair and laparoscopic repair
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Assuta Medical Center
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
sergio Susmallian, MD · Assuta Medical Center
Eligibility
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2003-01-01
- Primary Completion
- 2015-12-31
- Completion
- 2015-12-31
Countries
- Israel
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Does Tension-Free Herniorrhaphy or Laparoscopic Herniorrhaphy Achieve Equal or Better Recurrence Rates and Lower Costs While Achieving Equivalent Outcomes for Hernia Patients?
NCT00032448 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Three-port and Single-port TEP Repair in Adults
NCT01591395 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Telescopic Dissection vs. Balloon Dissection During Laparoscopic TEP Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT03276871 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair- Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) Versus Totally Extra Peritoneal (TEP)
NCT00687375 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Does the Mesh Have to be Fixed in Laparoscopic eTEP Repair of Inguinal Hernia?
NCT06070142 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Hernia Repair Using the Totally ExtraPeritoneal (TEP) Laparoscopic Approach Without Curare and Without Orotracheal Intubation.
NCT05323552 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Open and Endoscopic Technique in Female Inguinal Hernia Repair. FemaleHernia
NCT05863624 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
TEP Versus Open Minimal Suture Repair for the Sportsman's Groin
NCT02297711 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Bilateral vs Unilateral Totally Extraperitoneal Repair Among Patients With Unilateral Inguinal Hernia
NCT06380621 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Postoperative Pain After Endoscopic TEP vs. Lichtenstein Hernioplasty in Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT03566433 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Laparoscopic and Open Inguinal Hernia Repair in Elderly Patients
NCT06417346 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Laparscopic Hernioplasty in Recurrent Inguinal Hernia
NCT06050538 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Feasibility of Re-TREPP in Patients With a Recurrent Inguinal Hernia After Previous TREPP Repair
NCT03411226 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
3D vs 2D HD Laparoscopy in Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT02367573 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Pain and Quality of Life After Inguinal Hernia Repair: Laparoscopic Versus Open Repair.
NCT04211142 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Does the Mesh Have to be Fixed in Laparoscopic eTEP Repair of Bilateral Inguinal Hernia?
NCT06070207 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Validation of Quality of Life Assessment After Laparoscopic TAPP and TEP Surgery of Inguinal Hernias Using EuraHS of Life Score and Carolinas Comfort Scale™
NCT01936584 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Randomized Multicentre Study Comparing TEP With Lichtenstein Repair for Primary Inguinal Hernia
NCT00568269 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effects of Hernia Repair on Men's Sexual Functions
NCT03326700 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
COMPARISON OF LAPAROSCOPIC TOTAL EXTRAPERITONEAL HERNIA REPAIR AND LICHTENSTEIN HERNIA REPAIR
NCT03935503 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison Open Lichtenstein Repair and Totally Extraperitoneal Herniorrhaphy
NCT03820570 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Study Comparing Total Extraperitoneal Patch "TEP" Versus Lichtenstein According Chronic Pain
NCT00803985 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
LESS TEP vs. Three Port TEP for Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT04303182 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effectivity of Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair (TAPP) in Daily Clinical Practice - Early and Long-term Results
NCT02561910 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
A Prospective Study Comparing Single and Multiport Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT01660048 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA