Comparison of Post-operative Pain in Short Versus Long Stitch for Laparotomy Closure
NCT03828409 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 86
Last updated 2019-02-04
Summary
Laparotomy is a surgical procedure where an incision is made through the abdominal wall in order to gain access to the peritoneal cavity. Midline laparotomy incisions were the main type of abdominal access. However, there were complications associated with laparotomy such as incisional hernia, post-operative pain, surgical site infection and burst abdomen. The anterior abdominal wall consists of skin, fascia, subcutaneous fat, external oblique aponeurosis, internal oblique muscles, transversus abdominis and rectus muscles. The skin and parietal peritoneum are supplied by T7- T12 and L1 nerve. Hence, breaching of the peritoneum, giving rise to post-operative laparotomy pain. It is reported that approximately 60% of patients who underwent laparotomy do complain of post-operative pain.
Techniques of abdominal wall closure has been constantly in order to develop an ideal suture technique to minimise wound complications. One of the most significant changes in abdominal closure technique was the introduction of mass closure technique, known as 'long stitch' (LS). This conventional mass closure, uses a suture-to-wound length ratio (SL:WL) of 4:1, achieved by the use of continuous sutures at one centimetre from rectus edge with inter-suture distance of one centimetre. Studies have shown LS caused compression of tissues enclosed in the mass stitch, leading to tissue ischaemia and necrosis. 'Short stitch' (SS) was introduced in 1980s where it was reported to result in lower rate of incisional hernia and surgical site infection. It has a SL:WL of more than four, achieved by placing the suture five millimetres from rectus edge with inter-suture distance of five millimetre as well. It incorporates only the linea alba, which may reduce tension and post-operative pain.Studies has indicate that approximately 40% of post-operative patients reported inadequate pain relief despite therapeutic intervention. Inadequate pain control is associated with complications such as atelectasis, prolonged immobilization and hospital stay, thromboembolic event, cardiac morbidity, insomnia, ileus and poor wound healing The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of pain is commonly used as measures of pain score or intensity in clinical trials. A more objective way to evaluate the post-operative pain is to assess the usage of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) over a period of time. The commonly used PCA drug for post-operative patient is morphine. As SS relies on less tension and proper distribution of force along the fascial plane, it is possible that it might reduce post-operative pain as compared to LS technique. It can be assessed using total usage of analgesia (intravenous infusion or PCA), with correlation to the respective visual-analogue scales (VAS) or numeric rating scales (NRS) at that particular time. There is no study that evaluate post-operative pain difference between SS and LS technique.
The hypothesis of this study is that SS will reduce PCA morphine usage after midline laparotomy, which translate into reduction in post-operative pain. In order to detect the 30% reduction of PCA morphine, 86 patients are required.
Conditions
- Pain, Postoperative
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Short stitch
The rectus sheath are cleaned off the subcutaneous fats. Short stitch technique uses smaller needle and suture material. The suture is placed nearer to each other as compared to our conventional long stitch technique. It has inter-suture distance of 5mm and 5mm distance from rectus edge. The suture will be started at one end and sutured continuous until the other end. Hence, this technique is applied without tension.
- PROCEDURE
-
Long stitch
Long stitch uses a larger needle and suture material. The suture is placed 1cm from the linea alba and 1 cm from previous suture. This technique include mass closure sutures at the midline laparotomy
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
University of Malaya
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2017-01-31
- Primary Completion
- 2018-11-30
- Completion
- 2018-11-30
More Related Trials
-
Short Term Comparison of Two Different Techniques of Uterine Cesarean Incision Closure
NCT01287611 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Small-bite Versus Conventional Midline Fascial Closure in Abdominal Surgeries
NCT07340918 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Peritoneal Closure Versus Non Closure During Open Appendectomy
NCT02803463 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Randomized Trial on the Technical Aspects of Stoma Construction.
NCT01694238 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A New Abdomen Closure Technology Based on Component Separation: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT03111134 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Trial of Techniques for Umbilical Reconstruction
NCT02723409 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Adhesiolysis During Elective Abdominal Surgery on Per- and Postoperative Complication, Quality of Life and Socioeconomic Costs
NCT01236625 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Cold Knife Versus Monopolar Electrosurgery in Abdominal Incisions
NCT04236401 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Long Term Comparison of Two Different Techniques of Uterine Cesarean Incision Closure
NCT01289262 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Thoracotomy Closure Technique and Postoperative Pain Study: A Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT02063438 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Wound Complications After Elective Abdominal Surgery Using Two Closure Techniques
NCT03527433 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Suture Size in Laparotomy Wound Closure to Prevent Post-operative Complications
NCT05474677 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Hand-made Extracorporeal Knotting Versus Clip for Stump Closure in Laparoscopic Appendectomy
NCT07281612 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: EARLY_PHASE1
-
Optimizing Closed Incision Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Emergency Laparotomy
NCT05716490 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Surgical Site Infection Rate Between Primary, Delayed Primary and Vacuum Assisted Closures.
NCT02649543 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Staples Versus Suture for Cesarean Wound Closure
NCT01008449 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
PDS*Plus and Wound Infections After Laparotomy
NCT00998907 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Repair of Cesarean Scar Niche
NCT04307524 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Continuous Versus Interrupted Abdominal Wall Closure After Emergency Midline Laparotomy
NCT00544583 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Fascial Closure Techniques Post-Operative Pain Laparoscopy
NCT03254056 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Randomized Pilot Study Comparing Two Vacuum-wound-dressings for Open Abdomen Treatment
NCT00834314 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Appendicectomy Skin Closure Technique: Changing Paradigms (ASC)
NCT02625987 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Skin Closure With Tissue Adhesives vs. Subcuticular Suture After Robotic Urogynecologic Procedures
NCT03891004 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Small Versus Large Bite Closure of Emergency Midline Laparotomy
NCT04098380 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
NPWT vs Primary Closure in SSI Prevention for Emergency Laparotomies for Peritonitis
NCT05684198 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA