Photo-Activated Disinfection Versus Triple-Antibiotic Paste for Management of Necrotic Young Permanent Anterior Teeth

NCT03763110 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 40

Last updated 2018-12-05

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This study aims to compare regenerative endodontics for necrotic young permanent anterior teeth using oral photo-activated disinfection versus triple antibiotic paste in terms of:

1. Clinical success in terms of absence of any complication such as spontaneous pain, sinus or swelling.
2. Radiographic success in terms of healing of periapical radiolucency or increase root thickness, length or apical closure.

Conditions

  • Pulp Necrosis

Interventions

DEVICE

Photo Activated Disinfection

Photoactivated disinfection (PAD) is based on the interaction of a photosensitive antibacterial agent and a light source. It uses a nontoxic dye \[named photosensitizer PS\] and low-intensity visible light. In oxygen presentation, these combine to produce some cytotoxic species. The PS molecules attach to bacteria membrane

DRUG

antibiotic paste

An antibiotic mixture composed of ciprofloxacin, metronidazole, and minocycline, known as triple antibiotic paste (TAP) or "3mix", has been the most widely used medicament, This goes back to the studies by Hoshino et al.1996

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Cairo University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
8 Years
Max Age
13 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2016-10-15
Primary Completion
2018-12-15
Completion
2019-04-15

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03763110 on ClinicalTrials.gov