MedTrace Logo

Comparison Between Reciproc and Protaper Next

NCT02946099 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60

Last updated 2017-11-07

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Comparing the postoperative pain resulting after mechanical instrumentation using Reciproc reciprocating files versus that resulting after using ProTaper Next rotary files in asymptomatic necrotic molars.

Conditions

  • Dental Pulp Necrosis

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Reciproc files in reciprocating motion

An endodontic file that works through a reciprocating motion

PROCEDURE

ProTaper Next files in continuous rotary motion

An endodontic file that works through a continuous rotary motion

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Cairo University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
15 Years
Max Age
55 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2016-11-30
Primary Completion
2017-10-14
Completion
2017-11-30

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02946099 on ClinicalTrials.gov