Work Physiological-Biomechanical Analysis of a Passive Exoskeleton to Support Occupational Lifting and Flexing Processes

NCT03725982 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 39

Last updated 2023-07-12

Study results available
· View outcomes & findings →

Summary

BACKGROUND Industrial tasks that are characterized by high loads, a high repetition rate, and/or awkward body postures, put employees at higher risk to develop work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WRMSD), especially low back pain. To counteract the prevalence of WRMSD, human-robot interaction could improve the power of a person and reduce the physical strain. For the lower back, a reduction of spinal loading could be helpful. The passive upper-extremity exoskeleton Laevo® is developed to support physically heavy work: it supports the back during bending and should, consequently, result in less low back pain (Laevo®, the Netherlands).

OBJECTIVES The primary aim of this study is to assess to what extent wearing the exoskeleton changes:

* muscular activity of the erector spinae and biceps femoris muscles;
* knee compression force;
* posture of the upper and lower spine, trunk, hips and knees; ...in different tasks (static vs. dynamic), different trunk postures (trunk flexion vs. trunk flexion and rotation) and different knee postures (straight vs. stooped).

Secondary aims of this study are to assess to what extent wearing the exoskeleton changes:

* muscular activity of the trapezius descendens, rectus abdominis, vastus medialis and gastrocnemius medialis;
* perceived discomfort;
* heart rate;
* internal loadings on the spine, using a lumbar spine model;
* the performance of subjects during functional activities (e.g., stair climbing) when wearing the exoskeleton (either turned on or off); ...in different tasks (static vs. dynamic), different trunk postures (trunk flexion vs. trunk flexion and rotation), different knee postures (stoop vs. squat), and different static holding positions(0° vs. 30° vs. 60°) with different weights (0kg vs. 8kg vs. 16kg).

Conditions

  • Passive Upper-limb Exoskeleton

Interventions

DEVICE

Laevo ®

A passive exoskeleton supporting the lower back during bending and lifting tasks (for more information, visit the manufacturer's website: http://en.laevo.nl/).

DEVICE

No Laevo ®

The subjects will not wear any supporting device to perform the experiment, which serves as the control condition.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Audi AG

    collaborator INDUSTRY
  • BASF

    collaborator INDUSTRY
  • BMW AG

    collaborator INDUSTRY
  • Dachser Intelligent Logistics

    collaborator INDUSTRY
  • Daimler AG

    collaborator INDUSTRY
  • Deutsche Post AG

    collaborator INDUSTRY
  • Iturri Gruppe

    collaborator INDUSTRY
  • MTU Aero Engines AG

    collaborator INDUSTRY
  • University Hospital Tuebingen

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Model
CROSSOVER

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
40 Years
Sex
MALE
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2019-01-18
Primary Completion
2019-05-15
Completion
2019-05-22

Countries

  • Germany

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03725982 on ClinicalTrials.gov