MedTrace Logo

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes POD L GF vs POD F GF in Asian Eyes

NCT03688425 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 58

Last updated 2022-01-11

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Prospective, randomised, controlled, single-surgeon, single-center clinical study to compare the clinical outcomes of two trifocal IOLs differing in the dominance of additional power. The investigational device POD L GF shows dominance for the intermediate addition (+1.75 D), whereas the control device POD F GF shows dominance for the near addition (+3.5 D). Implantation of the IOLs is bilaterally.

Conditions

Interventions

DEVICE

IOL implantation experimental

Implantation of trifocal IOL POD F GF consisting of light distribution order: far \> intermediate \> near

DEVICE

IOL implantation active comparator

Implantation of trifocal IOL POD F GF consisting of light distribution order: far \> near \> intermediate

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Beaver-Visitec International, Inc.

    lead INDUSTRY

Principal Investigators

  • Robert Edward Ang, MD · Asian Eye Institute

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
40 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2018-10-09
Primary Completion
2021-08-28
Completion
2021-09-30

Countries

  • Philippines

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Diseases

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03688425 on ClinicalTrials.gov