Assessing Patient-reported & Patient-related Outcomes in Randomized Cancer Trials for Older Adults

NCT03676218 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 14

Last updated 2025-10-03

Study results available
· View outcomes & findings →

Summary

As older adults with cancer are underrepresented in randomized clinical trials (RCT), there is limited evidence on which to rely for treatment decisions for this population. Commonly used RCT endpoints for the assessment of treatment efficacy are more often tumor-centered (e.g., progression-free survival). These endpoints may not be as relevant for the older patients who present more often with comorbidities, non-cancer-related deaths, and treatment toxicity. Moreover, their expectation and preferences are likely to differ from younger adults.

The DATECAN-ELDERLY initiative combines a broad expertise, in geriatric oncology and clinical research, with interest in cancer RCT that include older patients with cancer. In order to guide researchers and clinicians coordinating cancer RCT involving older patients with cancer, the experts reviewed the literature on relevant domains to assess using patient-reported outcomes (PRO) and patient-related outcomes, as well as available tools related to these domains.

Domains considered relevant by the panel of experts when assessing treatment efficacy in RCT for older patients with cancer included functional autonomy, cognition, depression and nutrition. These were based on published guidelines from international societies and from regulatory authorities as well as minimum datasets recommended to collect in RCT including older adults with cancer. In addition, health-related quality of life, patients' symptoms, and satisfaction were also considered by the panel. With regards to tools for the assessment of these domains, we highlighted that each tool has its own strengths and limitations, and very few had been validated in older adults with cancer. Further studies are thus needed to validate these tools in this specific population and define the minimum clinically important difference to use when developing RCTs in this

Conditions

Interventions

OTHER

Elderly cancer patients

No intervention: Panel of international experts to provide definition of survival endpoints to be used in randomized controlled trials to assess treatment efficacy.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTC

    collaborator NETWORK
  • International Society of Geriatric Oncology

    collaborator OTHER
  • Institut Bergonié

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Carine Bellera, PhD · Institut Bergonié

Eligibility

Min Age
70 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2017-09-01
Primary Completion
2023-12-01
Completion
2023-12-01

Countries

  • France

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Diseases

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03676218 on ClinicalTrials.gov