Exploring Robotic-assisted Thoracic Surgery for Lung Cancer
NCT03658083 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 55
Last updated 2022-04-27
Summary
Background Surgery for lung cancer can be performed using open (thoracotomy) or minimally invasive techniques (Video Assisted Thoracic Surgery (VATS)). Despite being associated with fewer postoperative complications (PPCs) VATS is difficult to perform and is only used by 20-44% of thoracic surgeons in the UK. Robotic-Assisted Thoracic Surgery (RATS) maybe a more attractive minimally invasive approach. To date, no studies have explored the impact of RATS on exercise capacity or physical activity and although 1 study has looked at Heath Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) post-RATS compared to an open technique indicators of surgical technique were not controlled for. Furthermore, investigators have little understanding of patients' experience of RATS.
Aims
1. To examine the variability of change in exercise capacity and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) between those who receive thoracotomy V RATS.
2. To compare the difference in post-operative physical activity (step and activity count), across 7 days, in those who receive thoracotomy V RATS.
3. To explore the manner in which patients appraise their experience of undergoing RATS.
Methods:
A mixed-method, multi-center study will be undertaken, utilizing a prospective quasi-experimental study design and an interpretive phenomenological approach. 80 individuals, referred for a lung lobectomy with a primary or secondary diagnosis of lung cancer, will complete outcomes assessed at 4 time-points. The Incremental Shuttle Walk Test (ISWT) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ C30) and the EORTC Lung Cancer module (EORTC QLQ LC13) will be completed at: baseline, 3-6 days post surgery, 6-weeks post-surgery and at 3-month follow up. Patients will wear an activity monitor immediately post-surgery until 1-week post-discharge. Step and activity counts will be recorded. In-depth interviews will be conducted with up to 15 patients who underwent RATS to explore the manner in which patients appraise their experience of RATS.
Conditions
- Lung Cancer
- Thoracic Cancer
- Surgery
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Thoracotomy
Open surgery
- PROCEDURE
-
Robotic-assisted thoracic surgery
Minimally invasive surgery
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
collaborator OTHER -
Barts & The London NHS Trust
collaborator OTHER -
Teesside University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Samantha Harrison · Teesside University
Eligibility
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2017-10-12
- Primary Completion
- 2019-11-18
- Completion
- 2019-11-20
Countries
- United Kingdom
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Sleeve Lobectomy for Lung Cancer in Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
NCT06687408 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Robotic Lobectomy vs. Thoracoscopic Lobectomy for Early Stage Lung Cancer: RCT
NCT02617186 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Early Stage Lung Cancer by VATS Versus OPEN Lobectomy
NCT01933828 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Cost-effectiveness Evaluation of Robotic Surgery in the Removal of Lung Lesions in the ATS of Milan
NCT05674227 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Retrospective Multi-Center Study to Compare Perioperative Outcomes for Robotic-assisted Lobectomy With Those Associated With VATS and Open Lobectomy for Lung Cancer
NCT03347825 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Impact of Robotic Approach Compared to VATS and Open Approach on Quality of Life in Patients With Lung Cancer
NCT04353349 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Intraoperative Conversion During Video-assisted Thoracoscopy Resection for Lung Cancer Does Not Alter Survival
NCT04663191 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Multicenter Analysis of Different Approaches in Segmentectomies in Early-stage Lung Cancer
NCT06737107 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Is Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy a Clinical Alternative for Surgically Resectable Pathologic N2 NSCLC Patients
NCT03613467 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Robotic Surgery in Pulmonary Metastasectomy
NCT06466070 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
-
ELobectomy for NSCLC by VATS Versus Thoracotomy (ECTOP-1007)
NCT03786003 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Post-operative Pain and Quality of Life Between Subxiphoid and Intercostal VATS for Lung Cancer
NCT03331588 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Modified Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) Lobectomy for Early-stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
NCT01337037 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Robot-Assisted vs. Video-Assisted Lobectomy for NSCLC (RAVAR)
NCT06524427 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Quality of Life and Pain Outcomes Following Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery (VATS) Anatomic Lung Resection Versus Thoracotomy and Anatomic Lung Resection
NCT00598000 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
VATS VS. Open Thoracic Surgery for Stage II - III Lung Cancer
NCT04009915 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Feasibility of RUS Lung in MITS
NCT06952894 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Multicentric Analysis of Predictors of N1 Upstaging After Resection of cStage-I NSCLC
NCT02730897 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Subcostal Single-port Versus Intercostal Multi-port Robotic Lobectomy for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT07099105 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Oesophagectomy and Chest Wall and Respiratory Function
NCT03835273 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Assessment of Ergonomics in 3D vs 2D Thoracoscopic Lobectomy
NCT03925103 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Curative Effect and Quality of Life Between Uniportal and Open Sleeve Lobectomy for Central Type Lung Cancer
NCT03523468 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Efficacy and Safety of Cryoablation with Robotic Bronchoscopy System in Patients with Lung Cancer
NCT06832956 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
VATS Versus Open Pulmonary Lobectomy in the Limelight of OEP
NCT02910453 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Robotic Versus Video-assisted Lobectomy/Segmentectomy for Lung Surgery
NCT05270616 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA