MedTrace Logo

Ejaculatory Sparing Transurethral Incision Of The Prostate (ES-TUIP) Versus Conventional TUIP

NCT03176017 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 40

Last updated 2020-12-08

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

In this study, Investigators planned to compare ejaculatory sparing and non-ejaculatory sparing (conventional) TUIP using both subjective and objective assessment tools for the degree of deobstruction.

Furthermore, the impact of both techniques on ejaculation and its secondary effect on orgasm perception and different domains of sexual function will be thoroughly assessed.

Conditions

  • Prostate Hyperplasia
  • Transurethral Incision Of The Prostate
  • Ejaculatory Dysfunction

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Ejaculatory sparing TUIP

The bladder neck will be incised and vaporized at the 5 or 7-o'clock position. The incision will start near the ureteral orifice and carry downward to about 0.5-1.0 cm proximal to the verumontanum

PROCEDURE

Conventional TUIP

the bladder neck will be incised by Collins knife at the 5 or 7-o'clock position till the verumontanum.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Mansoura University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Ahmed M Shoma, MD · Urology and Nephrology center

  • Nasr Eltabey, MD · Urology and Nephrology center

  • Ahmed N Elshal, MD · Urology and Nephrology center

  • Mahmoud Laimon, Msc · Urology and Nephrology center

  • Ahmed Elkashef · Mansoura University

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
40 Years
Sex
MALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2020-10-01
Primary Completion
2021-10-01
Completion
2021-10-01

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03176017 on ClinicalTrials.gov