MedTrace Logo

Comparison of Graft Quality and Patient Morbidity Following Palatal Harvesting.

NCT03584906 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60

Last updated 2020-06-30

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare four different connective tissue graft harvesting technique in terms of graft quality and patient post-operative morbidity

Conditions

  • Gingival Recession
  • Palate; Wound

Interventions

PROCEDURE

DGG Harvesting approach

An epithelialized graft is harvested from the superficial palate and then extraorally de-epithelialized in order to obtain a connective tissue graft

PROCEDURE

ET harvesting approach

A connective tissue graft is harvested from the palate after reflecting a primary palatal flap

PROCEDURE

TDT harvesting approach

A connective tissue graft is harvested from the palate after reflecting a primary palatal flap

PROCEDURE

MT harvesting approach

An epithelialized graft is harvested from the maxillary tuberosity and then extraorally de-epithelialized in order to obtain a connective tissue graft

PROCEDURE

Root coverage procedure

A single or multiple gingival recession is treated with a coronally advanced flap and a connective tissue graft

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University of Milan

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Giulio Rasperini, DDS · University of Milan

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2018-08-16
Primary Completion
2020-05-28
Completion
2020-06-15

Countries

  • Italy

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03584906 on ClinicalTrials.gov