Comparison Between TPRK Versus AAPRK in Correction of Myopia

NCT03569423 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 100

Last updated 2018-06-26

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

PURPOSE: The aim of the study is to compare visual acuity means, refractive results, safety, and efficacy of TPRK with AAPRK as primary outcomes and surgical time, pain scores, haze levels, and healing time as secondary outcomes.

SETTING: Security Forces Hospital, Ophthalmology Department, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

DESIGN: Prospective, consecutive, nonrandomized case-control comparative study.

. METHODS: A total of 200 eyes of 100 patients were included. One hundred eyes underwent TPRK in the right eye (study group) and 100 eyes underwent AAPRK in the left eye (control group). Ablations performed with the Schwind Amaris, 750S. Clinical outcomes were compared Paired student's t-tests and Mann-Whitney tests were used for statistical analysis.

Conditions

  • Refractive Surgery
  • Myopia

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy

ablations were performed with the Schwind Amaris excimer LASER 750S. Paired student's t-tests and Mann-Whitney tests were used for statistical analysis.

PROCEDURE

Alcohol assisted photorefractive keratectomy

ablations were performed with the Schwind Amaris excimer LASER 750S. Paired student's t-tests and Mann-Whitney tests were used for statistical analysis.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Minia University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Shaaban A Elwan, MD · Minia University

Study Design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
54 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2017-02-15
Primary Completion
2018-04-15
Completion
2018-04-25

Countries

  • Egypt
  • Saudi Arabia

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03569423 on ClinicalTrials.gov