Topography-Guided Customized PRK Versus Q-value Adjusted PRK in Correction of Myopia With or Without Astigmatism

NCT03291873 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 104

Last updated 2020-07-07

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This study will include patients who will undergo PRK in both eyes, for each patient each eye will be randomly allocated to one of 2 procedures:

topography-guided ablation in one eye (group I) and Q-factor customized ablation in the other eye (group II).

Alcon/Wavelight Light Laser Technolo¬gie (GmbH, Erlangen, Germany) will be used for photoablation.

The wavelight Topolyzer (Wavelight AG, Erlan¬gen, Germany)and CSO Sirius scheimpflug camera combined with Placido corneal topography (CSO, Florence,Italy) will be used before and 1, 3 and 6 months after PRK. Refrac¬tive visual outcomes and corneal aberration changes will be compared between the two treatment modalities.

Conditions

  • Myopia

Interventions

PROCEDURE

PRK

PRK using Alcon-Wavelight Excimer Laser EX 500

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Kasr El Aini Hospital

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2017-10-25
Primary Completion
2019-06-25
Completion
2019-06-25

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03291873 on ClinicalTrials.gov