MedTrace Logo

3-dimensional Versus 2-dimensional Laparoscopy of Ovarian Cyst

NCT03453333 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 46

Last updated 2019-03-14

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Lack of depth perception and spatial orientation are drawbacks of laparoscopic surgery. The advent of the three-dimensional (3D) camera system enables surgeons to regain binocular vision. The aim of this study was to gain subjective and objective data to determine whether 3D systems are superior to two-dimensional (2D) systems in terms of surgical outcomes.

Conditions

  • Laparoscopy

Interventions

PROCEDURE

3D laparoscope

For laparoscopic camera system, a 10-mm ENDOEYE FLEX 3D Deflectable Videoscope (Olympus Corp., Germany) was used in the 3D group.

PROCEDURE

2D laparoscope

For laparoscopic camera system, a 10-mm 30º IDEAL EYES Laparoscope (Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI, USA) camera was used in the 2D group.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Kangbuk Samsung Hospital

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Taejong Song, MD PhD · Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
19 Years
Max Age
48 Years
Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2018-05-10
Primary Completion
2019-03-12
Completion
2019-03-12

Countries

  • South Korea

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03453333 on ClinicalTrials.gov