Clinical Evaluation of Two Types of Transalveolar Sinus Floor Elevation
NCT03445039 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 120
Last updated 2018-02-26
Summary
Background: Implant placement in the posterior maxilla is always troubled by the insufficient bone volume. Trans-alveolar sinus floor elevation (TSFE) has been proven a predictable surgical procedure to increase the bone height in the posterior maxilla. However, questions as the necessity of the bone grafting is necessary during the sinus lift and could the TSFE be performed when the residual bone height is below 5mm are still being debated. Besides, high-quality evidence on comparing the clinical outcome of transalveolar sinus floor elevation with osteotome and modified sinus floor elevation with crestal non-cutting drills is limited.
Methods/Design: 120 adult patients who fit the inclusion criterions are being recruited from the first clinical division, School and Hospital of Peking University (Beijing, China). All the patients are assigned into four groups according a table of random numbers. Participants receive 1) TSFE using osteotomes with bone grafting; 2) TSFE using osteotomes without bone grafting; 3) modified TSFE with bone grafting; and 4) modified TSFE without bone grafting. The clinical operators will be concealed with the assignment until the beginning of surgical procedures. In a one year follow up period, implant survival rates, complications, implant stability, bone remodeling around the implant and patient-reported outcome (visual analogue scale for intraoperative discomfort and postoperative pain) are observed and documented. The implant stability is gauged by the resonance frequency analysis for 7 times (2, 4,8,12,16,26,52 weeks). And the bone remodeling is observed and compared by CT scan.
Discussion: The result of the trial will support a better decision making in atrophy posterior maxilla when implant placement is needed. If favorable, the use of the modified TSFE would achieve as ideal outcome as the traditional TSFE but with less trauma and postoperative discomforts. Besides, whether the bone graft procedure is necessary for the TSFE will also be discussed.
Conditions
- Dental Implant
- Sinus Floor Augmentation
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
traditional TSFE
The TSFE procedure is performed by osteotomes (Straumann AG, Basel, Switzland) and mallet as the traditional ways.
- PROCEDURE
-
bone grafting materials
The bone substitute is placed into the siuns under the membrane before the implant placement
- DEVICE
-
TSFE by DASK drills
The TSFE procedure is performed by DASK(Dentium Advanced Surgical Kits) drills (Dentium, Korea), the residual cortical plate of the sinus floor is grinded by the drills.
- PROCEDURE
-
without bone grafting materials
The bone substitute will not be placed into the sinus before the implant placement.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Peking University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Feng Liu, Dr · Peking University hospital of stomatology, the first clinical division
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 70 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2017-12-02
- Primary Completion
- 2019-12-25
- Completion
- 2020-12-25
Countries
- China
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Evaluation of Bone Height Gain Following Trans-crestal Sinus Floor Elevation
NCT05411510 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
SINUS FLOOR WITH OSSEODENSIFICATION OR LATERAL WINDOW
NCT06123221 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Application of a Biphasic Calcium Sulfate Graft Material in Sinus Floor Elevation
NCT06533397 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Osteotome-mediated Sinus Floor Elevation With or Without Grafting Material
NCT04618900 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Bone Height Gain Following Transcrestal Sinus Floor Elevation Using Piezoelectric Surgery Versus The Conventional Osteotome Technique
NCT03944811 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Influence of Anatomy of Maxillary Sinus on New Bone Formation After Transcrestal Augmentation Procedures
NCT03209284 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Effectiveness in Limiting the Need to Elevate the Maxillary Sinus
NCT03357705 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Different Techniques of Crestal Sinus Lifting
NCT05735613 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Influence of the Sinus Floor-to-lower Window Margin Distance on Outcomes of Bone Window Repositioning in Lateral Sinus Floor Elevation With Simultaneous Implant Placement
NCT07045389 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
PRF vs. Graftless Sinus Lift With Implant Placement
NCT07090694 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Clinical Efficacy of Different Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation Procedures
NCT06876519 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Concentrated Growth Factors Applied in Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation Via a Lateral Window Approach
NCT03046173 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Xenografts With Platelet-rich Fibrin Versus Autogenous Bone in Alveolar Cleft Grafting
NCT04693741 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Stability of Short Implants Versus Standard Blx Implants With Internal Sinus Floor Elevation in Posterior Maxilla
NCT05779345 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Implants Placed With Crestal Sinus Approach Versus Osseodensification in Atrophic Posterior Maxilla
NCT06207578 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Implants Placed Without Bone Grafts in Two Different Sinus Floor Elevation Techniques.
NCT04309682 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Non Grafted Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation With Implant Placement Versus the Use of Short Endosseous Implants
NCT03661957 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Titanium Platelet-rich Fibrin in Sinus Floor Elevation Through Flapless Transcrestal Approach
NCT05721612 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Radiographic and Histomorphometric Assessment for Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation and Augmentation Using A Mixture of 1:1 Autogenous Bone With Deproteinized Bovine Bone Particulate Versus Deproteinized Bovine Bone Particulate
NCT07177495 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Osseodensification by Densah Burs Versus Osteotome
NCT04688957 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Study Between Lyophilized or Frozen Bone Allografts for Sinus-lifting
NCT02583737 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Sinus Augmentation in the Posterior Maxillary Region: a Case Report of 0mm Bone Height.
NCT06063980 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Different Techniques of Crestal Sinus Lift
NCT05922592 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Two Surgical Techniques for Building up the Bone Where a Dental Implant is to be Placed
NCT06871657 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Osseodensification Versus Osteotome Internal Sinus Lifting in Delayed Implant Placement
NCT05495490 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA