MedTrace Logo

One-stage Versus Two-stage Revision of the Infected Knee Arthroplasty

NCT03435679 · Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 97

Last updated 2024-12-11

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This study investigates functional outcome and safety after one-stage versus two-stage revision of the infected knee arthroplasty.

Half of participants are treated with a one-stage surgical procedure, while the other half is treated with a two-stage procedure.

The investigators hypothesize that the functional outcome and quality of life of the participants is superior after one-stage surgery compared to two-stage surgery.

Conditions

  • Periprosthetic Knee Infection

Interventions

PROCEDURE

one-stage

one-stage surgery

PROCEDURE

two-stage

two-stage surgery

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Odense Patient Data Explorative Network

    collaborator OTHER

  • Region of Southern Denmark

    collaborator OTHER

  • Odense University Hospital

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Martin Lindberg-Larsen · Martin Lindberg-Larsen

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2018-03-01
Primary Completion
2025-11-18
Completion
2026-11-18

Countries

  • Denmark

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03435679 on ClinicalTrials.gov