MedTrace Logo

Cost-effectiveness Evaluation of One Stage Versus Two Stage Exchange for Chronically Infected Total Hip and Total Knee Prostheses

NCT02651961 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 100

Last updated 2018-05-22

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Chronic infection after total joint arthroplasty generally requires implant exchange. Two stage exchange is considered as the gold standard procedure. However, some authors suggest that one stage exchange may be as effective. No consensus exists in the current literature. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the cost of both strategies in comparison to their success rate.

Conditions

  • Chronically Infected Total Hip of Knee Prosthesis

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Exchange of total hip or knee arthroplasty on same time

Removal of the index implants, extensive debridement, reimplantation of a new prosthesis

PROCEDURE

Exchange of total hip or knee arthroplasty in two time

Removal of the index implants in first time, extensive debridement, reimplantation of a new prosthesis in seconde time

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University Hospital, Strasbourg, France

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Jean-Yves JENNY, PH · Strasbourg's University Hospitals

Study Design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2018-05-03
Primary Completion
2022-10-02
Completion
2022-10-02

Countries

  • France

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02651961 on ClinicalTrials.gov