A Comparison of Conventional Versus Digital PAR (Peer Assessment Rating) Scores Using an Intraoral Scanner
NCT03405961 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 70
Last updated 2019-03-01
Summary
In dentistry, Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) is an objective way of quantifying how maligned a patient's teeth are by scoring orthodontic study models. It can also be used to assess treatment outcome by comparing pre- and post-treatment scores. Traditionally, PAR scoring is performed manually on plaster casts by a trained and calibrated individual. The plaster casts consume considerable amounts of storage space and the process of manual scoring can be time consuming and expensive. The recent decades have seen a rise in popularity of intra oral scanners in dentistry to produce digital study models. These obviate the need for physical storage space and a software can be used to calculate PAR scores more conveniently and at a faster speed. A review of the current literature showed that the CS 3600 intra oral scanner by Carestream Dental demonstrated acceptable accuracy for clinical use.
In this study, patients will receive the usual impressions and their moulds will be PAR scored manually (usual care pathway). In addition, they will also receive intra oral scans with Carestream 3600 and the digital models will be scored by a computer. Manual and digital scores will be compared and analysed for any significant discrepancies.
Conditions
- Malocclusion
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Carestream 3600 intra oral scan
Carestream 3600 is CE marked intra oral scanner manufactured by Carestream Dental. It is already licensed for use in dentistry to produce digital study models. The scanner is 220 x 38 x 58 mm large and operates using video capture technology. It emits no radiation. Carestream 3600 is connected to a computer via a USB port and a computer software (CS Model +) converts the scan into digital study models using trigonometric calculations. The software is then used to take measurements on the digital models and calculate PAR scores
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Kingston Hospital NHS Trust
collaborator OTHER - lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Martyn Cobourne, BDS MOrth · King's College London
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 11 Years
- Max Age
- 50 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2018-10-15
- Primary Completion
- 2018-12-15
- Completion
- 2019-01-07
Countries
- United Kingdom
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Assessment of Root Parallelism Following Orthodontic Treatment in Adolescent vs Adult Patients Treated With Maxillary First Premolar Extraction
NCT04139174 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Pain and Discomfort With Anterior Versus Posterior Builds-up
NCT04105127 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Quantification of the Differences in the Diagnostic Relationships Between Centric Occlusion Versus Maximum Intercuspation in Adult Orthodontic Patients : A Cross-sectional Study
NCT06220955 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Comparative Evaluation Of Two Bone-Anchored Maxillary Molar Distalization Appliances: Direct Versus Indirect Anchorage
NCT06507319 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Use of 2D and 3D Imaging Modalities and Its Influence on Diagnosis and Treatment Planning in Orthodontics
NCT01246830 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Intraoral Scanner With and Without Orthodontic Brackets
NCT06340867 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Indirect Bonding Accuracy of 3D Printed Digital Transfer Trays
NCT06167278 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of the Alignment Achieved Using Computer-guided Indirect Bonding of Orthodontic Brackets to Conventional Appliance Placement
NCT02221856 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Orthodontic Patient Experience of Intraoral Scans Versus Alginate Impressions
NCT05194956 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
3D Evaluation of Clear Aligners Versus Fixed Orthodontic Treatment of Lower Anterior Crowding
NCT06510569 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Time and Cost-implications of Intraoral Scans Vs Alginate Impressions
NCT06345989 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Trial to Compare Clear Aligners' Auxiliaries on Rotational Accuracy
NCT06418984 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Maxillary Canine Retraction Assisted With Two Different Methods of Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound
NCT05692817 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Impact of Integrating Dynamic Patient-Specific Motion and Implementing a Jaw Tracking System in the Attribution of the Occlusion in Full-Arch Restorations Through a Digital Workflow: a Clinical Study
NCT06773728 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
How Often Should We See Our Orthodontic Patients
NCT02918240 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Digital Versus Conventional Impression Techniques in Children
NCT04220957 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Tooth Borne Versus Temporary Anchorage Devices (TAD) Based Intrusion Systems for the Correction of Anterior Deep Overbite
NCT06430710 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Patient Satisfaction and Biting Force of New Design of Extracoronal Attachment (O T Cap Unilateral Attachment) Versus Conventional Partial Denture for Treatment of Unilateral Mandibular Distal Extension Area
NCT02951507 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Efficiency Of Different Intraoral Scanning Techniques In Orthodontic Patients Before And After Brackets Positioning: A Cross Sectional Study
NCT05389969 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Evaluation of Maxillary Posterior Teeth Intrusion by Skeletally Anchored Mousetrap Appliance in Adult Patient With Anterior Open Bite.
NCT06757686 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Smile Esthetics in Orthodontically Treated Patients With Bimaxillary-dentoalveolar Protrusion
NCT03074370 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Accuracy of 3DPrinted Windowed Bracket- Positioning Guide Compared To Thermoformed Indirect Bonding Tray
NCT03585881 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Effectiveness of Double-slot Brackets Versus Single-slot Brackets on the Rate of Canine Retraction
NCT06481761 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Characterizing Orthodontic Tooth Movement With Photographic Scans
NCT05780788 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Standing Versus Supine 3D Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Patient With Obstructive Sleep Apnea
NCT04874727 ·Status: COMPLETED