Catheter Orifice Configuration (Six-hole Versus End-hole) on Post-operative Analgesia After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

NCT03376178 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 72

Last updated 2017-12-18

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Multiorifice catheters have been shown to provide superior analgesia and significantly reduce local anesthetic consumption compared with end-hole catheters in epidural studies. This prospective, blinded, randomized study tested the hypothesis that, in continuous femoral nerve block (CFNB) under ultrasound guidance, multiorifice catheter would reduce local anesthetic consumption at 24h compared with end-hole catheter.

Conditions

Interventions

COMBINATION_PRODUCT

lidocaine and ropivacaine injection through catheters

injection of local anesthetic through an endhole or a sixhole femoral nerve catheter in the context of total knee replacement. Analgesic properties at 24 and 48h of both groups registered.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University Hospital, Geneva

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Martin Tramer · Anesthesiology department Of University Hospital of Geneva

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2014-05-31
Primary Completion
2015-04-30
Completion
2015-04-30

Countries

  • Switzerland

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Diseases

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03376178 on ClinicalTrials.gov