Outcome of Patients After Total Knee Replacement: A Comparison of Femoral Nerve Block and Epidural Anesthesia

NCT01631799 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 80

Last updated 2012-06-29

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Total knee replacement is very common in Germany. After surgery patients have severe pain in the knee; initiation of the physiotherapy, however, is important in the first three days after surgery. Continuous femoral blockade and continuous (lumbar) epidural analgesia are commonly used after surgery. Both methods are used in Germany. Both methods have advantages and disadvantages. We wanted to answer the question which method of analgesia - after total knee replacement - is better concerning complications and function (after 3 months) ?

Conditions

  • Morbidity
  • Mortality
  • Complications
  • Function

Interventions

DEVICE

Femoral catheter

Femoral catheter was inserted at the beginning of surgery. After surgery ropivacaine was administered continuously for three days. In addition, patients received piritramide via patient-controlled analgesia. The amount of ropivacaine was measured.

DEVICE

Epidural catheter

The epidural catheter was inserted at the beiginning of surgery. After surgery ropivacaine was applied continuously for three days. In addition, patients received piritramide via patient controlled analgesia. The amount of ropivacaine was measured.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University of Rostock

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Thomas Mencke, PD Dr. · Dep. of Anesthesia, University of Rostock

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
80 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2008-10-31
Primary Completion
2011-09-30
Completion
2011-12-31

Countries

  • Germany

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01631799 on ClinicalTrials.gov