MedTrace Logo

Effectiveness of the Tiger Catheter on Transradial Coronariography: Randomized Compared to JudKins cathETers

NCT03273218 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 120

Last updated 2019-03-06

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The aim of this study was to assess effectiveness and safety of Tiger (5Fr) vs Judkins (5Fr) catheters, in coronariography via the right transradial approach.

This was a prospective, randomized, study of paralled design. Consecutive patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), eligible for coronary angiography, was randomized after successuful cannulation of right artery and informed consent to either Tiger or Judkins catheters.

Conditions

  • Acute Coronary Syndrome

Interventions

DEVICE

Tiger catheter

DEVICE

Judkins catheter

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Marcelo Alberto OLIVA

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Marcelo OLIVA, MD · Hospital San Roque

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2015-12-31
Primary Completion
2016-07-20
Completion
2016-07-20
FDA Device
Yes

Countries

  • Argentina

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03273218 on ClinicalTrials.gov