MedTrace Logo

ADINA vs. High Flow Nasal Cannula Comparison Study

NCT03171129 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 40

Last updated 2026-01-30

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This study is to evaluate the feasibility of using a pressure limited nasal cannula system instead of a high flow nasal cannula system in the management of premature babies with respiratory distress.

Conditions

  • Respiratory Distress Neonatal

Interventions

DEVICE

Adaptive Dynamic Inspiratory Nasal Apparatus

Oxygen will be administered via ADINA

DEVICE

High flow Nasal Canula

Oxygen will be administered via nasal canula

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Loma Linda University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Mitchell R Goldstein, MD · Loma Linda University Health

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
23 Weeks
Max Age
40 Weeks
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2026-07-31
Primary Completion
2027-09-30
Completion
2027-09-30
FDA Device
Yes

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03171129 on ClinicalTrials.gov