High Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) Versus Nasal Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation (NIMV)for Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS): a Randomized, Controlled, Prospective Study

NCT01189162 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 80

Last updated 2015-08-13

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The investigators hypothesize that while the extremely low birthweight (ELBW) infants (\<1000 g) may need NIMV for the treatment of RDS, larger infants or the smaller ones post extubation may enjoy the comfort benefits associated with HFNC while getting coparable respiratory support to NIMV.

Conditions

  • Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Interventions

DEVICE

NIMV with SLE ventilator vs HFNC via Vapotherm

Nasal respiratory support for RDS

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Bnai Zion Medical Center

    lead OTHER_GOV

Principal Investigators

  • Amir Kugelman, MD · Bnai Zion Medical Cente

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
1 Minute
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2010-01-31
Primary Completion
2016-07-31
Completion
2016-07-31

Countries

  • Israel

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01189162 on ClinicalTrials.gov