Low or High Ligation of the IMA With Apical Lymph Node Dissection in Rectal Cancer Laparoscopic Surgery
NCT03013153 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 748
Last updated 2017-01-12
Summary
Laparoscopy colon surgery is accepted worldwide in the recent years. But there is still argument on the effect of laparoscopy rectal surgery. Laparoscopy has advantages on showing the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA), protection of autonomic nerve, low rectal anastomosis, and total mesorectum excision. However, debate on the level of IMA ligation and debonding of splenic flexure never ends. This study is going to give a clear and definite answer to how and why surgeons should deal with the IMA in laparoscopy rectal surgery,base on the 3D reconstruction of IMA and identification of IMA perfusion types.
Conditions
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Low ligation with apical lymph node dissection
Low ligation with apical lymph node dissection (LAND). Left colic artery (LCA) is identified according to the CT 3D-reconstruction, tie the sigmoid artery and superior rectal artery, preserved LCA while low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery is performed. Lymphadenectomy to the apical lymph nodes (No.253)is performed around the IMA until 2 cm from the aorta.
- PROCEDURE
-
High ligation
High ligation (HL) Open the peritoneum proceeds cephalad towards the duodenojejunal angle of Treitz, and the mesenteric root is incised 1 cm below the inferior margin of the pancreas. The aortomesenteric window is opened wide and the inferior mesenteric vessels are exposed. The IMA is ligated and divided at 2 cm from its origin. The inferior mesenteric vein (IMV) is divided and ligated below the pancreatic margin.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Meijin Huang, MD · The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 75 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2016-12-31
- Primary Completion
- 2018-12-31
- Completion
- 2023-12-31
Countries
- China
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Multicenter Study on Laparoscopic Versus Open PANP-TME for Male Mid-low Rectal Cancer Patients
NCT02165800 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision Versus Laparoscopic TME for Rectal Cancer
NCT02252250 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Selective sPlenic flExure Mobilization for Low colorEctal Anastomosis After D3 lYmph Node Dissection (Speedy Trial)
NCT03895255 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Rectal Neuroendocrine Neoplasms Undergoing Laparoscopic Total Mesenteric Excision
NCT06279299 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Mesorectal Excision (ME) Versus ME With Lateral Node Dissection for Stage II, III Lower Rectal Cancer (JCOG0212)
NCT00190541 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Preservation Versus Excision of Denonvilliers Fascia in L-PANP Surgery
NCT02311803 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Fluorescence Laparoscopic Navigation for Rectal Cancer and Sigmoid Colon Cancer
NCT05730595 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Safety of Mid and Low Rectal Cancer Surgery Without Dissection of the No.253 Lymph Node (S-M-O-O-T-H)
NCT06146946 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Medial Border of Laparoscopic D3 Lymphadenectomy for Right Colon Cancer
NCT04518449 ·Status: WITHDRAWN
-
Standardization of Laparoscopic Surgery for Right Hemi Colon Cancer (SLRC)
NCT02942238 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic-assisted Total Gastrectomy Versus Open Total Gastrectomy With Splenic Hilum Lymph Nodes Dissection
NCT02711033 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Open or Laparoscopic Mesolectal Excision in Low Rectum Cancer
NCT04561830 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparative Study of Tumor Specific Mesocolic Excision and Complete Mesocolic Excision for Right Sided Colon Cancer : Asian Multicenter Retrospective Study
NCT06865586 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Laparoscopic Assisted Transanal Resection of Rectal Cancer With Total Mesorectal Excision
NCT03171298 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Gastric Function Preserving Surgery Combined With Resection of the Anterior Lymphatic Drainage Area
NCT05160753 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Multicenter Study on Preservation Versus Excision of Denonvilliers Fascia in L-PANP Surgery
NCT02435758 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Influence of Neoadjuvant Therapy on the Resectability of Hepatic Metastases From Colorectal Cancers
NCT00172159 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Compare Outcomes After High and Low Ligation of Inferior Mesenteric Artery in Colorectal Cancer
NCT06253949 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Study on Laparoscopic Spleen-Preserving No. 10 Lymph Node Dissection for Advanced Middle or Upper Third Gastric Cancer
NCT02333721 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Simultaneous Versus Staged Resection for Initially Resectable Synchronous Rectal Cancer Liver-limited Metastasis
NCT00677586 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Resection Site Order in Simultaneous Approach of Colorectal Liver Metastasis
NCT07272928 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Laparoscopic Spleen-Preserving No. 10 Lymph Node Dissection for AGC
NCT03708783 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The China Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy SNAPSHOT
NCT04628182 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Multicenter Study on Laparoscopic Distal Subtotal Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer (CLASS-01)
NCT01609309 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Investigate the Radical Extent of Lymphadenectomy of LAparoscopic Right Colectomy for Colon Cancer(RELARC).
NCT02619942 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA