Selective sPlenic flExure Mobilization for Low colorEctal Anastomosis After D3 lYmph Node Dissection (Speedy Trial)
NCT03895255 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 142
Last updated 2020-02-27
Summary
In the Low Anterior Resection of rectum for cancer, the section level of IMA and the need of SFM is still debated.
The aim of this study is to explore the different impacts of high and low ligation with peeling off vascular sheath of inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) in low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer. This study purpose to demonstrate that low IMA ligation, sparing of left colic artery (LCA) and selective SFM results in higher anastomotic leakage rate than high IMA ligation with routine SFM (with the difference of more than 5%).
Conditions
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Paraaortic lymph node dissection, IMA high ligation, TME, routine splenic flexure mobilization
Nerve-sparing paraaortic lymph node dissection is performed. The inferior mesenteric artery is divided at 1-2 cm from its origin from the aorta. Nerve-sparing total mesorectal excision is performed. Splenic flexure is mobilized. Side-to-end sigmoido-rectal anastomosis is created.
- PROCEDURE
-
Paraaortic lymph node dissection, IMA low ligation, TME, selective splenic flexure mobilization
Nerve-sparing paraaortic lymph node dissection is performed. Then inferior mesenteric artery is skeletonized down to the origin of left colic artery and divided below it. Nerve-sparing total mesorectal excision is performed. Splenic flexure is mobilized only if sigmoid colon is unsuitable for anastomosis or doesn't reach the rectal stump. Then descending-rectal side-to-end anastomosis is created.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Russian Society of Colorectal Surgeons
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Petr Tsarkov, Prof · Russian Society of Colorectal Surgeons
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 85 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2016-10-02
- Primary Completion
- 2020-05-02
- Completion
- 2021-11-02
Countries
- Russia
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Mesorectal Excision (ME) Versus ME With Lateral Node Dissection for Stage II, III Lower Rectal Cancer (JCOG0212)
NCT00190541 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Preservation Versus Excision of Denonvilliers Fascia in L-PANP Surgery
NCT02311803 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Complete Mesocolic Excision in Comparison With Conventional Surgery for the Right Colon Cancer
NCT04871399 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Compare Outcomes After High and Low Ligation of Inferior Mesenteric Artery in Colorectal Cancer
NCT06253949 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Benchmarking Trial Between France and Australia Comparing Management of Primary Rectal Cancer Beyond TME (Total Mesorectum Excision) and Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer
NCT02551471 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Multicenter Study on Preservation Versus Excision of Denonvilliers Fascia in L-PANP Surgery
NCT02435758 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Complete Mesocolon Excision vs Locoregional Lymphadenectomy in Sigmoid Colon Cancer (CMELL)
NCT03083951 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Resection Site Order in Simultaneous Approach of Colorectal Liver Metastasis
NCT07272928 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Laparoscopic Versus Open PANP-TME for Male Mid-low Rectal Cancer Patients
NCT02164136 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Mediastinal Lymph Node Dissection in Conjunction With Pulmonary Metastasectomy From Colorectal Cancer
NCT03113318 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Radiographic Validation of the Inferior Mesenteric Artery Tie Level in Rectal Cancer Surgery
NCT03875612 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Pathology Assessment of Mesorectal Fascia After TME by Laparoscopic, Open, TransAnal and Robotic Approaches (LOTARTME)
NCT04949672 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Indocyanine Green-guided Lymphadenectomy in Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Low Rectal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy
NCT05873621 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Complete microscopicE Resection Margin (R0) and Lymph Node Involvement After Standard Pancreatosplenectomy (SPS) Versus Radical Anterograde Modular Pancreatosplenectomy
NCT03679169 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Survival of Patients With a Reduction in the Number of Lymph Nodes in Rectal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy
NCT04456283 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Complete Pathologic Response Rectal Cancers
NCT03351959 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Intraoperative Monitoring of the Pelvic Autonomic Nerves
NCT01585727 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Medial Border of Laparoscopic D3 Lymphadenectomy for Right Colon Cancer
NCT04518449 ·Status: WITHDRAWN
-
Laparoscopic Assisted Transanal Resection of Rectal Cancer With Total Mesorectal Excision
NCT03171298 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Open or Laparoscopic Mesolectal Excision in Low Rectum Cancer
NCT04561830 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Lymph Node Yield in Colon Cancer Resection Specimens
NCT04260139 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Laparoscopic Right Hemicoloectomy for Right Colon Cancer With a Medial-to-lateral Approach Orientated by SMA or SMV
NCT03329495 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Safety of Mid and Low Rectal Cancer Surgery Without Dissection of the No.253 Lymph Node (S-M-O-O-T-H)
NCT06146946 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
MRI Split Scar Sign as a Predictor to Complete Pathologic Response After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation in Rectal Cancer
NCT04745091 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Lateral Nodal Recurrence in Rectal Cancer
NCT04486131 ·Status: RECRUITING