Comparing Stability and Cost-Effectiveness of 3 Bicortical Screws Vs Adjustable Plate and 2 Bicortical Screws in Fixation of BSSRO

NCT02950727 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 12

Last updated 2021-10-05

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

In this current study a comparison between 3 positional screws versus the adjustable plating system in conjunction with 2 positional screws. The patients will be selected to have retrognathic mandible requiring advancement. Hypothetically the advantage of the adjustable plating system will be compared with the three positional screws. In theory, the investigators will be using the inherent advantage of the intraoperative flexibility of the adjustable plating system in verifying the position of the proximal segment (condylar segment), hence eliminating the immediate postoperative relapse that is reported with using three positional screws. This will be evaluated both clinically and cephalometrically.

Conditions

  • Mandibular Hypoplasia

Interventions

DEVICE

3 bicortical screws

after mandibular bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy surgery is performed in the first group the osteotomy will be fixed using 3 bicortical screws

DEVICE

adjustable plate and 2 bicortical screws

after mandibular bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy surgery is performed in the second group the osteotomy will be fixed using adjustable plate and 2 bicortical screws

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Joseph Van Sickels

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2015-10-31
Primary Completion
2017-03-07
Completion
2017-03-07

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02950727 on ClinicalTrials.gov