Comparison Between M-Pro and ProTaper Next

NCT03692039 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 50

Last updated 2020-07-14

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Comparing the postoperative pain resulting after mechanical instrumentation using M-pro files versus that resulting after using ProTaper Next rotary files in lower molar with symptomatic Irreversible pulpitis molars.

Conditions

  • Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis

Interventions

PROCEDURE

M-pro files in rotating motion

An endodontic file that has controlled memory properties

PROCEDURE

ProTaper Next files in rotating motion

An endodontic file that has an off center mass of rotation

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Cairo University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
45 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2018-10-01
Primary Completion
2019-10-01
Completion
2019-10-01

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03692039 on ClinicalTrials.gov