Comparison of DNA Ploidy and Conventional Cytology

NCT02921100 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 150

Last updated 2016-09-30

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

150 patients who had suspected pancreatic malignancy were planed to be enrolled in this study. Equal cytological samples of each patient undergoing EUS-FNA were examined by digital image analysis and conventional cytology respectively. The investigators aim to compare the efficacy of DIA and conventional cytology in diagnosing pancreatic cancer. Further more, the investigators also collected the blood sample of each enrolled patient for advanced study.

Conditions

  • Biopsy, Fine-Needle

Interventions

PROCEDURE

cytology

The conventional cytology was interpreted independently by two cytopathologists, both of whom are blinded to the DIA results. The conventional cytologic diagnosis were classified as no abnormal cells, atypical cells, suspicious malignant cells and malignant cells.

PROCEDURE

DNA ploidy

DIA is a form of cytologic analysis that quantifies cellular constituents by using spectro photometric principles and a sister technique to flow cytometry.Quantification of DNA content, chromatin distribution, and nuclear morphology can be determined and suggest features of malignancy

PROCEDURE

EUS-FNA

All the enrolled participants underwent an operation of EUS-guided fine needle aspiration. Histological and cytological samples were obtained following this step.

DEVICE

EUS-guided fine needle

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Changhai Hospital

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Dong Wang, Dr. · Digestive endoscopic center of Changhai Hospital

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
90 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2015-01-31
Primary Completion
2016-10-31

Countries

  • China

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02921100 on ClinicalTrials.gov