MedTrace Logo

Comparing the Diagnostic Efficacy of Different Suction Techniques for EUS-FNB of Pancreatic Solid Lesions

NCT04100941 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 300

Last updated 2019-09-24

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

There are many factors that can affect the diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA, including lesion factors, the endoscoist experience, the needle size, the number of needle passes, and the suction technique. since diagnostic efficacy of different suction techniques for EUS-FNB is still uncertain, thus we decided to compare the diagnostic efficacy of three common methods: the 10 ml standard negative pressure, slow pull and wet suction.

Conditions

  • Pancreatic Mass

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

standard suction

After the needle is inserted in the mass, removing the stylet before performing EUS-FNA. Then attach a 10mL syringe to the end of needle. 20 times of for-backward Suction was applied after the lesion was punctured.

DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

slow pull

After the needle is inserted in the mass, slowly pull the stylet out while performing EUS-FNA with 20 times for-backward.

DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

wet suction

After removing the stylet, the needle was flushed with 5mL of saline solution to replace the column of air with saline. A 10mL syringe was attached to the end of the needle. 20 times of for-backward Suction was applied after the lesion was punctured.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Shenzhen People's Hospital

    collaborator OTHER

  • The Affiliated Hospital Of Southwest Medical University

    collaborator OTHER

  • Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology

    collaborator OTHER

  • The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University

    collaborator OTHER

  • Changhai Hospital

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Zhao-shen Li, M.D.,Ph.D. · Changhai Hospital

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE
Model
CROSSOVER

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
75 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2019-06-10
Primary Completion
2020-05-30
Completion
2020-11-30

Countries

  • China

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04100941 on ClinicalTrials.gov