MedTrace Logo

Comparison Between End-to-side and Side-to-side Anastomosis After Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy

NCT02897531 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 130

Last updated 2025-03-05

Study results available
· View outcomes & findings →

Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of end-to-side anastomosis after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy compared with that of side-to-side anastomosis. The investigators hypothesize that the end-to-side anastomosis may be associated with superior recovery compared with side-to-side anastomosis after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy under enhanced recovery program. The primary endpoint is the cumulative recovery rate, consisting of the recovery time of diet, pain, ambulation, and afebrile status.

Conditions

  • Anastomosis

Interventions

PROCEDURE

ES anastomosis

The side wall of the transverse colon will be anastomosed to the end of the distal ileum with one circular stapler, and the blind end of the transverse colon will be closed with one linear stapler.

PROCEDURE

SS anastomosis

The side wall of the transverse colon will be anastomosed to the side wall of the distal ileum with two linear staplers.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Seoul National University Hospital

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Sung-Bum Kang, M.D, Ph.D. · Seoul National University College of Medicine Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
80 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2016-09-30
Primary Completion
2019-08-31
Completion
2020-07-31

Countries

  • South Korea

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02897531 on ClinicalTrials.gov