Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Lesions Originating in the Paracaval Portion of the Caudate Lobe
NCT04499261 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 110
Last updated 2020-08-05
Summary
This study aimed to evaluate the safety, feasibility and efficacy of laparoscopic for resecting paracaval-originating lesions by contrast of open procedures.
Conditions
- Paracaval Portion
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
laparoscopic surgery
Patients were supine in a reverse Trendelenburg position and received intravenous inhalation combined with anesthesia. The patients' legs were spread apart. A carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum was established. The intermittent Pringle's maneuver was carried out when necessary. Five trocars were placed in a fan shape around the lesion. Cholecystectomy was performed routinely. First, the liver was mobilized. Then, the liver parenchyma was transected and the branches of the hepatic veins and pedicles encountered were clipped and divided. The lesion was meticulously separated from the vascular structures and liver parenchyma and completely resected. The raw surface was treated with bipolar coagulation to achieve hemostasis and repeatedly washed until no bleeding or bile leakage was confirmed. Finally, the specimens were packed in a specimen bag and removed. The raw surface was packed with biological hemostatic materials, and drainage tubes were routinely placed.
- PROCEDURE
-
Open surgery
Patients were placed in the supine position and received intravenous inhalation combined with anesthesia. The intermittent Pringle's maneuver was carried out when necessary. Routinely, a reversed L-shape incision was performed. Cholecystectomy was performed routinely. First, the liver was mobilized. Then, the liver parenchyma was transected and the branches of the hepatic veins and pedicles encountered were clipped and divided. The lesion was meticulously separated from the vascular structures and liver parenchyma and completely resected. The raw surface was treated with bipolar coagulation to achieve hemostasis and repeatedly washed until no bleeding or bile leakage was confirmed. Finally, the specimens were packed in a specimen bag and removed. The raw surface was packed with biological hemostatic materials, and drainage tubes were routinely placed.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Southwest Hospital, China
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Shuguo Zheng, M.D. · Shuguo Zheng, MD Study Director Institute of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Army medical university
Study Design
- Allocation
- NON_RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 70 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2019-09-25
- Primary Completion
- 2021-09-25
- Completion
- 2022-09-25
Countries
- China
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparison of the Effects of Deep and Moderate Neuromuscular Blockade on Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter
NCT04211064 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Nomogram for Predicting Difficult Laparoscopic Appendectomy
NCT06818942 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Comparison Between Intraperitoneal Versus Intramuscular Neostigmine on Pattern of Postoperative GIT Motility in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT03505255 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Registrar Performances in MIDP
NCT04429074 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
A Trial on Laparoscopic Appendectomy Versus Single Port Appendectomy
NCT01348464 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
NOTES-Assisted Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Surgery
NCT00848146 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Appendectomy by Low Impact Laparoscopy vs Routine Laparoscopy : a Randomized Prospective Monocentric Trial
NCT04614519 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Estimation of the Difference Between the Temperature of the Peritoneal Microenvironment and the Central Body Temperature During Laparoscopic Surgery. Prospective Observational Study
NCT04294758 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Intra-Operative Complication Assessment and Reporting With Universal Standards: Survey
NCT04994392 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Laparoscopic Versus Open Partial Nephrectomy - Surgical and Oncological Outcomes
NCT01093079 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Laparoscopic Approach in Adhesive Intestinal Obstruction
NCT06799208 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Study of the Relationship Between Curarization and Pneumoperitoneum in Laparoscopic Surgery
NCT07005518 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
A Volumetric Nomogram for Height, Weight, and Intra Abdominal Volume
NCT04515485 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Evaluation of Abdominal Wall Lifting During Laparoscopic Direct Trocar Insertion
NCT01726231 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
The Impact of Laparotomy and Analgesia Methods on Diaphragm
NCT06403540 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
The Effect of Postoperative Referred Pain in the Left Shoulder on Short-term Outcomes for Laparoscopic Gastrectomy
NCT03482609 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Prevalence of Port Site Hernia After Mesh Placement in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.
NCT03495557 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy Prospective Randomized Control Study
NCT05611489 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Low vs Standard Pneumoperitoneum Pressure During Single Port Access Laparoscopic for Adnexal Pathology
NCT02625025 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopy Versus Clinical Follow up to Detect Diaphragm Injury
NCT01044550 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Versus Hand Assisted Laparoscopic Trans-peritoneal Laparoscopic Nephrectomy as One Day Surgery (i.e.: Are There Differences in Postoperative Outcome / Convalescence)
NCT02295982 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Trial on Postoperative Outcomes According to the Number of Trocar During Laparoscopic Appendectomy
NCT00816933 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Comparison of Changes of ONSD Between Groups of Laparoscopic Surgery With and Without Epidural Saline Injection
NCT04758013 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Choosing the Technique for First Abdominal Entry in Laparoscopy
NCT03084653 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Laparoscopic Versus Open Sigmoid Colectomy for Diverticular Disease
NCT00453830 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4