Laparoscopic Versus Open Sigmoid Colectomy for Diverticular Disease
NCT00453830 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 100
Last updated 2009-02-18
Summary
Aim: This is a prospective, randomized comparison of traditional open (OS) and laparoscopic sigmoidectomy (LS) in patients with complicated diverticular disease. The study is designed in order to minimize bias by standardizing the two procedures and blinding patients and nurses during the preoperative and early postoperative period.
Hypothesis: A laparoscopic approach for sigmoidectomy has significant advantages over the open technique with respect to postoperative pain, duration of ileus, length of hospital stay, and perioperative morbidity.
Methods: Patients with complicated diverticular disease who are candidates for elective sigmoidectomy will be randomized the day before surgery, and anaesthetic technique and postoperative management will be standardized between groups. Surgeons with experience in both laparoscopic-assisted and open colectomy will perform both types of procedures. At the end of the operation, identical, opaque wound dressings will be applied and left in place until postoperative day 4. Both patients and nursing staff will therefore be blinded to the type of surgical technique during the early postoperative period.
Endpoints:
A) Postoperative pain assessed by the Visual Analog Scale at postoperative days 1, 2, and 3.
B) Postoperative intake of systemic opiates (morphine)
C) Duration of postoperative ileus, quantified by the interval in hours between the end of the procedure and passage of first stool.
D) Duration of hospital stay.
E) Surgical complications, such as wound infection, anastomotic leakage, bleeding
F) General medical complications, such as cardiopulmonary, pneumonia, and renal failure.
Rationale: This study will determine whether a laparoscopic sigmoidectomy is associated with significant clinical advantages over the traditional open approach when patients with complicated diverticular disease are blinded to the operative technique.
Conditions
- Diverticulitis
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
laparoscopic sigmoid resection
a laparoscopic 5 trocars approach for left colon mobilization, sigmoid colon transsection and intracorporeal colorectal anastomosis
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
University Hospital, Geneva
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Philippe Morel, MD · University Hospital Geneva - Department of Surgery
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- SINGLE_GROUP
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 80 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2005-01-31
- Primary Completion
- 2009-02-28
- Completion
- 2009-02-28
Countries
- Switzerland
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
the Role of Laparoscopy in Lower Gastrointestinal Surgical Emergencies in Adults.
NCT05584579 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of Dry-lab Laparoscopic Training and Robotic Virtual Simulator
NCT04989881 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis After 72 Hours of Symptoms
NCT01548339 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Application of Laparoscopy in Gastrointestinal Injury
NCT01994148 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Appendectomy by Low Impact Laparoscopy vs Routine Laparoscopy : a Randomized Prospective Monocentric Trial
NCT04614519 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Proficiency-based Versus Free Laparoscopic Training in Cholecystectomy on a Virtual Reality Simulator
NCT01615549 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Role of Laparoscopy in Upper Abdominal Surgical Emergencies in Adults: A Retrospective Observational Study.
NCT05591495 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Laparoscopic Ultrasound Guided Minimal Invasive Excision of Intra-/Retroperitoneal Tumors
NCT04911634 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy Plus Peritoneal Lavage for Acute Complicated Appendicitis Patients With Diffuse Peritonitis
NCT06633744 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Study of the Relationship Between Curarization and Pneumoperitoneum in Laparoscopic Surgery
NCT07005518 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Applying Long-term Follow-up to Improve Patient Selection in Laparoscopic Anti-reflux Surgery
NCT03959020 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Assessing Outcomes After Surgery for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disorder
NCT00518505 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Prevalence of Port Site Hernia After Mesh Placement in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.
NCT03495557 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Meta-Analysis on Damage Control Surgery in Patients With Non-Traumatic Abdominal Emergencies
NCT04448912 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy Prospective Randomized Control Study
NCT05611489 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Open to Laparoscopic Reverse Conversion of Perforated Appendicitis
NCT05283733 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Single Incision Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Appendectomy
NCT01515293 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Safety and Efficacy Study of Single Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Acute Appendicitis
NCT01007318 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Transgastric Peritoneoscopy and Appendectomy
NCT00952146 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Light Endoscopic Robot Use in Laparoscopic Surgery
NCT00828035 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Surgeon Perception of Gastric Decompression at Time of Gynecologic Laparoscopy
NCT06137976 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Approach in Adhesive Intestinal Obstruction
NCT06799208 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
NOTES-Assisted Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Surgery
NCT00848146 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Appendectomy Performed by Junior SUrgeonS: Impact of 3D Visualization on Surgical Outcome
NCT03770897 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Lesions Originating in the Paracaval Portion of the Caudate Lobe
NCT04499261 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA