SI + CC Versus 3:1 C:V Ratio During Neonatal CPR

NCT02858583 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 27

Last updated 2024-08-29

Study results available
· View outcomes & findings →

Summary

Research question In newborn infants requiring CPR, does CC superimposed by sustained inflation compared to 3:1 compression to ventilation ratio improves return of spontaneous circulation?

Overall objective: CC superimposed by sustained inflation will improve short- and long-term outcomes in preterm (\>28 weeks or older) and term newborns.

Hypothesis to be tested Primary hypothesis: By using CC superimposed by sustained inflation (CC+SI) during CPR the time needed to achieve return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) compared to the current 3:1 compression to ventilation (C:V) will be reduced in asphyxiated newborns.

Conditions

  • Heart Arrest
  • Birth Asphyxia
  • Bradycardia

Interventions

PROCEDURE

CC+SI

chest compression will be delivered during sustained inflation (CC+SI). The duration of each sustain inflation is 20sec. After 20sec a pause of 1sec id done before the next sustained inflation is delivered for another 20sec. Chest compressions are given continuously. This approach is continued until return of spontaneous circulation.

PROCEDURE

3:1 C:V

During 3:1 C:V. 3 chest compressions are given, then stopped and then 1 inflation is given. This approach is continued until return of spontaneous circulation.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University of Alberta

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Georg Schmolzer · University of Alberta

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
0 Minutes
Max Age
20 Minutes
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2017-10-19
Primary Completion
2022-09-22
Completion
2022-09-22

Countries

  • Austria
  • Canada

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02858583 on ClinicalTrials.gov