MedTrace Logo

Transperitoneal vs Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic or Robotic Partial Nephrectomy

NCT02849119 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 106

Last updated 2016-07-29

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Both laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) and robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) can be performed through transperitoneal (TP) or retroperitoneal (RP) approach. RP approach is less utilized than TP approach because of technical difficulties when using rigid laparoscopic instruments in the small space of retroperitoneum cavity. However, with advanced surgical skills and thoughtful patient selection, RP approach may be associated with shorter operative time (OT), less estimated blood loss (EBL), shorter length of hospital stay (LOS) compared with TP approach.

Therefore, the investigators performed randomized control trial to compare the outcomes of the two approaches (TP-LPN or RPN vs RP-LPN or RPN).

Conditions

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Laparoscopic or robotic partial nephrectomy

Laparoscopic or robotic partial nephrectomy of a small renal masses (T1a) through transperitoneal or retroperitoneal approach

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Samsung Medical Center

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Seongil Seo, MD · Urology department of Samsung Medical Center

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2016-01-31
Primary Completion
2017-01-31
Completion
2017-01-31

Countries

  • South Korea

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Diseases

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02849119 on ClinicalTrials.gov