MedTrace Logo

Comparison of Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer Versus Jet Nebulizer in the Pediatric Asthma Patient

NCT02774941 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 220

Last updated 2020-01-31

Study results available
· View outcomes & findings →

Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare clinical outcomes related to the current practice of using a jet nebulizer (JN) with aerosol mask (AM) or mouthpiece (MP) versus a vibrating mesh nebulizer (VMN) with a valved-mask (VM) or MP in the treatment of acute moderate to severe asthma in Children's Medical Center Dallas Emergency Department (CMCED).

Conditions

Interventions

DEVICE

Jet Nebulizer

Standard single patient-use small volume JN (AirLife™ Sidestream® High-Efficiency Nebulizer, CareFusion, Yorba Linda, CA)

DEVICE

Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer

Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer (Aerogen® Solo with Ultra adapter, Aerogen Ltd, Galway, Ireland)

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
2 Years
Max Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2016-08-31
Primary Completion
2019-03-08
Completion
2019-03-08

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Diseases

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02774941 on ClinicalTrials.gov