Does Less Trendelenburg Make a Difference in Robotic Assisted Gynecological Procedures?
NCT02728999 · Status: TERMINATED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 22
Last updated 2024-10-04
Summary
Patient/Population: Women over the age of 18, who are not pregnant and are undergoing benign, robotic-assisted gynecologic procedures at Lutheran General Hospital.
Intervention: Decreasing the angle of Trendelenburg for the procedure Control: Steep Trendelenburg, which is the usual standard of care, to the limit of the operative bed, which is 30 degrees.
Outcome: Outcomes will include the mean angle of Trendelenburg in the experimental arm and the difference in Trendelenburg between the two arms. Additional outcomes included will be end tidal Carbon dioxide, peak airway pressure, mean arterial pressure, heart rate and arterial Carbon dioxide. Secondary outcomes will include operative time, blood loss and conversion to laparotomy.
Conditions
- Benign Female Reproductive System Neoplasm
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Steep Trendelenburg
•Subjects who undergo steep Trendelenburg will remain in 30 degrees of Trendelenburg, and the da Vinci robot will be docked. After subjects are asleep an arterial line will be place in one wrist by the anesthesiologist. It will be removed at the conclusion of the procedure.
- PROCEDURE
-
Decreased Trendelenburg
•Subjects who undergo decreased Trendelenburg will be taken out of Trendelenburg to the minimal angle possible that enables adequate visualization, as determined by the primary surgeon, at which time robot will be docked. After subjects are asleep an arterial line will be place in one wrist by the anesthesiologist. It will be removed at the conclusion of the procedure.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Kirsten Sasaki, MD · Advocate Lutheran General Hospital
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2013-06-30
- Primary Completion
- 2016-07-20
- Completion
- 2016-07-20
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Study Comparing Conventional vs. Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
NCT00485355 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Endometrial Cavity After Endometrial Ablation
NCT02087228 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Minimally Invasive Benign Hysterectomy
NCT01865929 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Lower Pneumoperitoneum Pressure During Laparoscopic and Robotic Hysterectomy
NCT04125173 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Complications Associated With Promontofixation for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Comparing Robot Assisted Laparoscopic and Non-robot Assisted Laparoscopic Surgical Procedures
NCT01320215 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Robotic Assisted Sacral Colpopexy : A Prospective Study Assessing Outcomes With Learning Curves
NCT01535833 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Prehabilitation Plus ERAS Versus ERAS in Gynecologic Oncology: a Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT04596800 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE3
-
A Trial on Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Versus Robotic Hysterectomy
NCT00895284 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Uterosacral Ligament Suspension vs Robotic Sacrocolpopexy
NCT02741830 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Abdominal Colpopexy: Comparison of Endoscopic Surgical Strategies
NCT01124916 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Postoperative Blood Pressure Changes After Benign Gynecologic Surgery
NCT00757484 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Vaginal Vault Suspension During Benign Hysterectomy. A Questionnaire and Register-based Study.
NCT02859272 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
TLH With Prior Uterine Artery Clipping at Its Origin Versus Conventional TLH
NCT05028543 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
ROBYN Study - Robotic Assisted Surgery in Gynecological Indications Compared to Conventional Laparoscopy
NCT05496244 ·Status: WITHDRAWN
-
Forced Versus Spray Coagulation in Women Undergoing LLETZ-conization for Cervical Dysplasia: a Randomized Trial
NCT02330471 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Hysterectomy for Benign Gynaecological Conditions With or Without Tubectomy
NCT02281487 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Safety, Efficacy and Operability of Using the New Tissue Containment System During Laprascopic Hysterectomy
NCT04423172 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Abdominal Diastasis Repair by Robotic Surgery
NCT04176874 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Prospective Study for Vaginal Vault Prolapse After Hysterectomy: Comparison of Two Surgical Methods
NCT02290288 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Retroperitoneal Tunneling Versus Dissection Technique During Sacrocolpopexy
NCT05969067 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
SCP vs HUSLS for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair
NCT02800512 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Prospective Data Collection in Connection With Two Different Treatment Methods: Robotic Assisted Laparoscopy and Conventional Laparoscopy
NCT03861195 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Prospective Data Collection to Compare RAL for Hysterectomies and Other Indications in to Conventional Laparoscopy
NCT05613816 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Transvaginal Sacrospinous Hysteropexy Versus Laparoscopic Uterine Lateral Suspension
NCT05586984 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Pelvic Floor Support After Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Benign Conditions: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Vaginal Cuff Closure Techniques
NCT03753516 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA