MedTrace Logo

Comparison Between Intrauterine Contraceptive Device Insertion During Cesarean Section Vs Conventional Application

NCT02674139 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 8

Last updated 2016-09-27

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The study aims to compare immediate post-placental (within 10 minutes of placenta delivery) intrauterine contraceptive device (Copper T 380A) insertion versus conventional placement at 6 weeks (often referred to as delayed or interval insertion) regarding the clinical outcomes (safety, efficacy, expulsion and continuation rates) for women undergoing caesarean section.

Conditions

  • Contraception

Interventions

DEVICE

Copper T 380A IUD

intrauterine contraceptive device T-shaped loaded with cupper

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Beni-Suef University

    collaborator OTHER

  • sara AbdAllah

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • sara AA mohamed, master

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
45 Years
Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2016-02-29
Primary Completion
2017-03-31
Completion
2017-06-30

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02674139 on ClinicalTrials.gov