Off-midline Closure Errors as a Risk Factor for Recurrence Following Limberg Flap in Patients With Pilonidal Sinus
NCT02663466 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 180
Last updated 2016-01-26
Summary
Background. Limberg flap, one of the recently being popularized off-midline closure techniques, is widely performed for the treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus; however, recurrences still can be seen.
Objective. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between recurrence and off-midline closure errors made in Limberg flap reconstructions.
Design. A multicenter, matched-case-control study was conducted in three participating centers in Turkey.
Settings. Each hospital's database was searched separately and all patients with and without recurrence who underwent LF surgery for primary SPS from January 2008 to July 2015 were identified.
Patients. Sixty patients with recurrent disease (recurrent group, RG) and 120 matched cases of recurrence-free patients for at least 5 years following surgery (non-recurrent group, NRG) were included to the study.
Interventions Main outcome measures. According to the off-midline closure concept, LF reconstructions were classified into incorrect closures (Type 1, 2 and 3) and correct closures (type 4, 5 and 6). Then the two groups were analyzed.
Conditions
- Pilonidal Sinus
- Recurrence
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
erroneous off-midline closures
All patients with pilonidal sinus recurrent disease following Limberg flap reconstruction in the recurrent group were examined by the authors in each study center and high resolution close-up photos of the patients' sacrococcygeal area were taken. These photos were then sent to all authors to asses and reach a collective decision to classify the erroneous off-midline closure technique and precisely measuring the distance between the flap border and the midline in the cleft. Same evaluation method was applied to the patients in nonrecurrent group. Following the completion of the assessments, all digital data of the patients were permanently deleted.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Medical Park Gaziantep Hospital
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Mehmet Kaplan, M.D. · Bahcesehir University Medical School
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 16 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2015-01-31
- Primary Completion
- 2015-07-31
- Completion
- 2015-11-30
Countries
- Turkey (Türkiye)
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Rhomboid Flap Versus Primary Closure After Excision of Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Sinus. (A Prospective Randomized Study)
NCT01223599 ·Status: WITHDRAWN
-
Surgical Approach for Pilonidal Disease
NCT04334681 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Lateral Advancement Flap Versus Classic Limberg Flap in The Treatment Of NonComplicated Pilonidal Sinus
NCT04572919 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Limberg-flap: Prospective Data Collection
NCT00672555 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Primary Wound Closure Using a Limberg Flap Versus Secondary Wound Healing Following Pilonidal Sinus Excision
NCT01889394 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Karydakis and Limberg Flap Treatment of Pilonidal Sinus in Adolescent. a Prospective, Randomised Study
NCT04217824 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Crystallized Phenol Versus Transposition Flaps for Treatment of Pilonidal Disease: A Prospective Study
NCT01792557 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Karydakis Versus Limberg Flap for the Management of Primary Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Sinus
NCT07271537 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
The Outcomes of Keystone Perforator Island Flap Versus Lay Open in Re-recurrent Pilonidal Sinus Disease
NCT06741449 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Conservative Versus Surgical Treatment of Umbilical Pilonidal Disease
NCT01662765 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Karydakis Flap Versus Burow's Triangle Advancement Flap in the Surgery of Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Sinus Disease
NCT05289297 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Open Wide Excision Versus Minimal Surgery for Pilonidal Disease
NCT01241136 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Rhomboid Flap vs. Deep Suturing in Recurrent Pilonidal Sinus
NCT06152952 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Excision and Reconstruction of the Natal Cleft With a Parasacral Perforator Flap Versus Open Excision With Secondary Healing, in the Management of Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Disease.
NCT03534700 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Histological Analysis of Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Sinus Specimens
NCT04356768 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Umblical Pilonidal Sinus Evaluation
NCT04856605 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Combined Open and Closed Approach for Management of Pilonidal Sinus by Special U-shaped Sutures Without Drain.
NCT04017260 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Two Different Technique in Treatment of Chronic Pilonidal Disease
NCT01268969 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Outcomes of Karydakis, Primary Closure, and Pit Picking Methods in the Treatment of Pilonidal Sinus: A Prospective Study in Women
NCT06518499 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
The Most Frequently Preferred Surgical Method In The Treatment Of Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Disease
NCT04599517 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Unroofing Curettage for Pilonidal Disease
NCT05339828 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Mid-line Excision Versus Karydakis Operation for Pilonidal Sinus
NCT00412659 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Staging System for Chronic Symptomatic Pilonidal Sinus Disease
NCT02712970 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
LOOP VS DOUBLE SUTURE TECHNIQUES IN SACROSPINOUS FIXATION: A TWO-YEAR STUDY
NCT07106866 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Phenol or Laser: Best Minimally Invasive Treatment for Pilonidal Sinus?
NCT06721169 ·Status: RECRUITING