MedTrace Logo

Conservative Versus Surgical Treatment of Umbilical Pilonidal Disease

NCT01662765 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 84

Last updated 2017-02-16

Study results available
· View outcomes & findings →

Summary

The aim of the study was to compare the results of conservative and surgical treatment, to create an algorithm for the management of the disease, and gain more information about the etiology, pathogenesis, and course of the disease. The investigators hypothesise that surgical treatment of UPS will be better than conservative management in terms of recurrence rate, healing time, patient comfort and satisfaction, and cost effectiveness.

Conditions

  • Pilonidal Sinus
  • Sinus; Dermal, Pilonidal
  • Umbilical Granuloma

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Surgery

modified umbilectomy

OTHER

conservative

this treatment will include conservative procedures under local anesthesia for patient comfort.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Zeugma Saglik Hizmetleri San. Tic. Ltd. Sti.

    collaborator INDUSTRY

  • Medical Park Gaziantep Hospital

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Mehmet KAPLAN, MD · Medical Park Gaziantep Hospital, Gaziantep, Turkey

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2003-11-30
Primary Completion
2010-05-31
Completion
2012-05-31

Countries

  • Turkey (Türkiye)

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01662765 on ClinicalTrials.gov