Simplified Versus Conventional Technique for Complete Denture Fabrication.
NCT02652403 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE2 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 42
Last updated 2016-01-11
Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a simplified technique of conventional dentures fabrication, comparing it to a traditional technique, by evaluating the impact of oral health on quality of life, satisfaction of individuals and chewing efficiency as well assessing the quality of prosthetics and TMD. Furthermore, the cost involved in the manufacture of dentures through technique simplified will be compared to the cost involved in the traditional technique.
Conditions
- Edentulous
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Complete conventional dentures
The typical operations of conventional technique will be carried out dentures fabrication and clinical appointments and laboratory steps will be necessary until denture insertion: Preliminary impression using irreversible hydrocolloid in a stock trays; Individual acrylic resin trays fabrication; Functional impressions using Zinc oxide-eugenol paste and low fusion compound in a individual acrylic resin trays; Maxillary occlusion rims fabrication; Maxillary occlusion rims fabrication adjustments, Centric relation records and transference of the maxillary occlusion rims positions to semiadjustable articulators using a facebow; Setting of teeth in wax; Complete denture wax try-in; Insertion, instructions and postinsertion appointments.
- DEVICE
-
Complete simplified dentures
For a complete simplified denture fabrication, individual acrylic resin trays fabrication and functional impressions steps will be deleted, and the facebow for transference of the maxillary occlusion rims positions to semiadjustable articulators will be replaced by the table Camper.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Patricia dos Santos Calderon, Doctor · Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 35 Years
- Max Age
- 95 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2015-03-31
- Primary Completion
- 2015-12-31
- Completion
- 2015-12-31
More Related Trials
-
Patient Satisfaction and Retention of Upper Complete Denture Base Using Rapid Prototyping Versus a Conventional One
NCT03354715 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Seven-year Follow-up Study of Patient Satisfaction With Three-Implant-Retained Mandibular Overdentures
NCT04726540 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Patient Satisfaction and Retention in Implant Supported Telescopic Overdenture With Different Copings
NCT04032223 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Patient Satisfaction and Microbial Changes in Complete Dentures.
NCT03043456 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Dimensional Accuracy of Complete Denture With Rapid Prototyping and Conventional Method
NCT03119753 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Simplified Technique in Removable Complete Prosthesis Versus Conventional Technique in Edentulous Patients
NCT06698978 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Cost-effectiveness Analysis of the Single-implant Mandibular Overdenture Treatment
NCT02710357 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
a 10-year Follow-up Study of a Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT02289443 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Cost-effectiveness of the Single-implant Mandibular Overdenture Versus Mandibular Conventional Denture
NCT03463174 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Accuracy of 3D Printed Maxillary Complete Dentures
NCT03613896 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Mini Implants Supported Over Dentures Versus Conventional Implant After Bone Expansion
NCT03326453 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Complete Denture Tooth Movement in Digital Light Processing Versus Conventional Fabrication Techniques
NCT04025697 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Manually Versus Digitally Fabricated Removable Partial Dentures
NCT01191073 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of the Single Implant-retained Mandibular Overdenture Treatment
NCT01801566 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Mandibular Overdentures Retained by Conventional or Mini Implants
NCT01411683 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Anatomical Factors Influencing Accuracy in Fully Guided Implant Placement.
NCT06255522 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Compare the Difference in Occlusal Force Distribution and Denture Retention Using 2 Different Denture Base Materials in Implant Retained Overdenture
NCT07250503 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Conventional Versus 3-D Printed Complete Denture Regarding Retention, Accuracy, Elctromyographic Activity and Patient Satisfaction.
NCT05834530 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Study Comparing Two Different Denture Base Materials in Implant Retained Overdentures
NCT07271641 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Digital 3D Printed Temporary Removable Partial Denture.
NCT06106243 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Within-subject Comparison of Mandibular Overdentures Retained by 1,2,or 3 Implants
NCT01566227 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Fully Guided Versus Conventionally Guided Implant Placement by Dental Students
NCT04546269 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Patient Satisfaction and OHRQoL In Removable Versus Fixed Implant Prostheses
NCT04694209 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Randomized Study For Minimally Invasive Splinted Implants
NCT02107612 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Satisfaction and Adaptation After Elevation of Vertical Dimension of Occlusion Using Overlay Denture or Fixed Crowns
NCT03579134 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA