MedTrace Logo

Evaluation of Post-endodontic Pain After Root Canal Treatment With Two Rotary Systems : Mtwo & Safe-sider

NCT02644031 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 150

Last updated 2015-12-31

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Post-endodontic pain (PP) still is major problem for endodontic patients, analgesics are routinely prescribed. Incidence of PP is reported extensively, and reviewed. PP is a complicated multi factorial process and is affected by factors related to patients, to the tooth and to the skills and experience of the dentist and because of that, if the interrelation of these factors is not considered in a PP, study data might be confusing. Any study trying to evaluate the effect of a specific technique or new device in the incidence or characteristics of PP should control all the confounding factors that have been described to be involved in the tested outcome.

reports mention a variable prevalence of PP, ranging from 82.9 to 10.6%. These variations are because of the differences in study methods, and treatment procedures after root canal treatment, selection of patients or experience and skills of the dentists, vary when different studies are compared.

Many studies had confirmed that chemomechanical debridement of the root canal results in extrusion of dentinal chips, pulp tissue fragments, necrotic tissues, microorganisms, and root canal irrigants through the apical foramen. All preparation techniques and instruments, regardless of maintaining shorter working length of the apical terminus have reported to be related with extrusion of infected debris, and some of them extruded less material and others extruded more.

Periapical inflammation and postoperative flare-ups may result from apical extrusion of debris that is also referred to as the "worm" of necrotic debris A common outcome of the studies examining the amount of apically extruded debris was that the techniques involving a push-pull filing motion usually produce a greater mass of apical debris than those have rotational action Files which has reciprocating and in-and-out filing motion, may act as a piston, extruding more debris and irrigants. While the file with continuous rotation motion like a screw conveyor improving transportation of dentinal chips and debris coronally.

In this study, investigators compare post-endodontic pain between these two systems. Mtwo ( continuous rotation system) with safe-sider (reciprocating system). Therefore, the aim of this study is Evaluation of post-endodontic pain after root canal treatment with two rotary systems: Mtwo \& safe-sider

Conditions

  • Pain, Postoperative

Interventions

PROCEDURE

mtwo rotary system

post-treatment pain after using mtwo rotary system

PROCEDURE

safe-sider rotary system

post-treatment pain after using safe-sider rotary system

PROCEDURE

hand files

post-treatment pain after using hand files

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Zahedan University of Medical Sciences

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • eshaghali saberi, professor · professor of endodontics department

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
20 Years
Max Age
50 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2015-12-31
Primary Completion
2016-02-29
Completion
2016-03-31

Countries

  • Iran

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02644031 on ClinicalTrials.gov